English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Agree?

2007-07-19 14:57:04 · 27 answers · asked by Jared L 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

There is a mountain of scientific evidence that proves Christianity is true which is why it is fair that if you are not a Christian you will burn in Hell forever when you die.

2007-07-19 14:58:05 · update #1

27 answers

no ... and spiritual things are not defined by physical tools either ...

2007-07-19 15:01:33 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

WOW! Whats even better is the mountain of evidence supporting evolution. Darwin himself called it "one long argument". And then tells a friend "I do not pretend to adduce direct evidence of one species changing to another". Then he claims there should be "numerous intermediate varieties" linking on creature to another. But cons readers into believing all life forms exterminated by their predecessors. What did they do, eat them? Good way to get rid of the evidence, huh?

Then he goes on to blame the fossil record itself for lack of evidence to support his theory! Was he "smokin"? His book contains over 800 examples of the "subjunctive mood". In other words...maybe, perhaps, could be, possibly, might, a lot of fiction and I don't knows! This theory has been debatable since its inception. But why?

We know the theory of gravity. We know 1s and 0s work well for pc communication. We know 4 + 4 = 8. But what's wrong with THIS theory? Its not a theory at all. It's a "p h i l o s o p h y". One derived by a British man and only really followed by Americans (22%), British, and Germans. It's no wonder it was so widely used to justify colonialism and racism.

Survival of the fittest right? If we could deduce that some people are fully evolved and others are really more or less animals. It could justify many evils. The same way an abortionists teaches that a child is only a child when he or she comes out and they can hear them cry. Funny what people will do to support their own personal philisophical point of view (or madness).

Non believers have been so hell bent in their war against God they have done things such as pieced together ape bones and called them early humans. Glued the tail of a dinosaur to a bird. And Haeckels Embryos.... They never quit do they?

All people of the world, though they may believe what they will at least have the basic common sense to know not to believe only what non believers in the "west" believe. That is why we are losing the war on terror. Because "westerners" take nothing serious, they assume (something non believers do a lot of) that no one else does either. And once....AGAIN they were wrong. This time its going to cost us in a way even they could understand.

If only they could stop assuming.

God bless

2007-07-19 15:35:51 · answer #2 · answered by F'sho 4 · 1 0

there is not any thank you to "scientifically" tutor any faith in any respect, using fact technology and faith handle countless issues. The Bible isn't a scientific textbook, as any thinking guy or woman can inform you. occasion: the e book of Leviticus lists a bat in a team of "unclean" birds. yet a bat isn't a chook. Does that make the Bible a hundred% erroneous? No, even even though it incredibly proves that's not a hundred% precise, a minimum of so some distance as technology is worried. i'd desire to cite different scientific inaccuracies in the Bible, such using fact the assumption of a flat earth (considered in Genesis a million) and the thought that the Earth is the midsection of the universe (see Joshua 10:12-13). i'd desire to record fairly the impossibilities in the Bible, including a 6000-year-old Earth (which replace into calculated by Bishop Lightfoot in the seventeenth century, using the assumption of the six 24-hour days of creation) and the virgin start of Christ (a narrative in keeping with Matthew's mistranslation of Isaiah 7:14). In different words, technology and faith handle distinctive concerns. faith would not communicate approximately technology, and technology won't be able to tutor faith, considering that faith is "believing wherein can't be considered," in accordance to the e book of Hebrews. possibly Christianity has some greater scientific credibility in its claims and theology than, as an occasion, paganism, yet technology has not shown it to be the "one real" faith.

2016-10-22 03:10:18 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Where is this "mountain"? What type of scientific proof could there be? There certainly is historical evidence and artifacts associated with Christianity, but to make such a claim as you have, you really need to site some specifics.

2007-07-19 15:27:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Okay Ill convert...as soon as you show the evidence. although its gonna be hard considering christians thought that the sun revolved around the earth, that its physically impossible to have a baby without having sex first or without anything in you(you know what I mean, the whole michael jackson thing), its not possible to split water open like in the moses story, it was impossible to build a boat big enough for each and every single animal to fit in it, much less with enough food to feed them all. also lets not forget the bible describing the earth as a circle and not a sphere

2007-07-19 15:03:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

God (yehovah as you call him) is absolute. He is immortal has no resemblamce to any object we see in the universe, nor he is a man or woman much else a father or mother....How then could you call Yehovah as the father of Jesus as in the christian Trinity theory (the father, the mother and the child). This belief is LOGICALLY a fallacy...there's no need for any scientists to prove it wrong. Yehovah is the supreme being, the creator of all this grand scheme of things....how could christian demote him (yehovah) so low as to become a father ( just like me and my father and my grandfather and so on). This and few other concepts are logically false...therefore the religion of christian is false !!!

2007-07-19 18:25:21 · answer #6 · answered by magua43 1 · 0 0

I remember that All the Scientists Who approved the Christian relegion to be the true relegion were Christians.The same Scientists also approved for the Reverends,priests,preachers to Molest young Boys???.

2007-07-19 15:13:44 · answer #7 · answered by kunde. 2 · 1 0

Scientifically?

Not beyond a shadow of a doubt. But there's where faith begins.

Still, the claims in the Bible are the most historically accurate of any events in antiquity. There is ample achaeological evidence, much corroboration in ancient literature unrelated to the Bible, and of course the eyewitness accounts themselves that survive in the Bible to support the claims.

I believe not based on the scientific evidence or even the evidence above. I believe based on what Jesus Christ has done in my life. I do believe He is the only way to Heaven and He said so Himself.

2007-07-19 15:06:12 · answer #8 · answered by pandjnewton 2 · 0 3

1. There is no emperical proof.
2. It's a FAITH based religion.
3. How can it be the one true religion when there are so many others out there saying the exact same thing?

2007-07-19 15:35:11 · answer #9 · answered by Trillium 4 · 0 0

Were the scientists who proved this Christian?

2007-07-19 15:01:13 · answer #10 · answered by READ 1 · 3 0

I sincerely doubt the veracity of your claims. Most scientists are not christian.

2007-07-19 15:01:34 · answer #11 · answered by CC 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers