Is The BUSH Admin Planning On Making The U.S. The Next IRAQ?? Sure Looks Like It to Me!?

Question

Army forces help local pro-government police, paramilitary, and military forces perform counterinsurgency, area security, or local security operations. They advise and assist in finding, dispersing, capturing, and destroying the insurgent force.
NOTICE THE"PRO-GOVERNMENT POLICE"! Read the Entire Military Plan For the U.S War Protestors or anyone who dissents the Current Admin!

http://www.rense.com/general77/clamp.htm

Now Read The Exc. Order Signed By Bush YESTERDAY! Notice that this is the official white house website! http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/07/20070717-3.html

Cops, Where do you stand, Will you fire on U.S. citizens who protest bush?

Tell me your thoughts!

Lavadog, there is nothing "Honorable" about BUSH!

I also served in the military! But was not brainwashed as you were!

Grow up!

If you are saying you would fire on the people you supposedly defend and the country and the constitution you supposedly defend as a Marine, You are not worthy of the uniform!

Answer 1

That link, and your question, are complete lies.

The link give a slew of text, proclaiming that it comes from Top Secret detailed military plans.

This is a complete lie.

The initial text on that link is from the Interim Field Manual 3-07.22, available at

http://www.fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fmi3-07-22.pdf

Humanist...you bought into that nonsense? I thought you were for the truth ALWAYS? You didn't do any checking...you just swallowed it hook line ans sinker? Shame...

Strange...the second White House link you provided says nothing about martial law, domestic clampdown, census, house to house assault teams, or insurgents. It does say that assets will be frozen of individuals who

(i) to have committed, or to pose a significant risk of committing, an act or acts of violence that have the purpose or effect of:

(A) threatening the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq; or

(B) undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq or to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people;

(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, logistical, or technical support for, or goods or services in support of, such an act or acts of violence or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.

Jim C, you are either a liar of evil proportion, or completely nuts.

Answer 2

some say it incredibly is previous information yet it incredibly is been pronounced such distinctive situations approximately such distinctive issues and mutually because it incredibly is real the certainty remains that BushCo has dodged duty for all this. in simple terms because of the fact you're able to save away from the situation long sufficient does not advise that it incredibly is nevertheless no longer a controversy. i want to work out some duty from the whitehouse yet their reaction is that there exchange right into a time-honored consensus approximately WMD and Saddam. yet even while the actuality exchange into revealed approximately those issues Bush nevertheless clung to them as though they have been gospel. the final analysis is that GWB needed a reason to invade Iraq and he grabbed fake claims and created a number of his very own. If he incredibly exchange into truthful approximately making those to blame to pay then we would have first became to the worldwide places from which the terrorists got here from, notwithstanding, a approach or the different, they have because of the fact that exchange into our allies. Having study the countless different posts i'm in awe how the concepts-set of a few is that "he lied yet so did many different politicians" by that reasoning we ought to continuously empty the prisons because of the fact properly, particular they dedicated crimes yet so did many others, so i assume that ought to make it ok. properly it incredibly isn't any longer ok! If somebody lies to further their very own time table then they must be dropped at duty for it, if we did no longer do it contained in the previous that's no longer permission for others to do a similar. Have we missed what's precise and incorrect to the element that something is now ok?

Answer 3

Your addition is very good - wow -

I wasn't trying to "dis" you - but you needed somthing like that to add credibility

I read though it breifly - Being a government legal paper it will take some time to digest it for what it actually means

But the big one that strikes me is the changes made to include US citezen's

What acts of extraordinary violence have occured in the US - To the best of my knowldge the Bush supportes are openly bragging none since 9/11 - So what is or could be the motivation behind the law passed as stated ?

Now all you have to do and I will look to, is look for legal commentary to describe the possible intertratations of that bill

If there aren't any then double your suspicons There clearly should be journalist and expert reactions available for changes in the law -

There is legal and jornalist reactions to changes in dog license fee's - there should be some more than credible people out there to comment on this

Answer 4

Bush would not only use the countries military on us, he would also hire mercenaries from a company called Blackwater. The scary thing about them is that they are above the law. Look up the Martial Law Act of 2007. It would give him supreme power (no legislative/judicial branches to do checks/balances) in the case of a terrorist attack, revolt, natural disaster, or any other thing that Bush could call an emergency. He would also be able to move back the 2008 elections. Hellooo fascism...

Answer 5

That has always happened in any administration. Why do you find this so unusual?, during the war with Japan, during WWII, all Japanese citizens were detained in barbwired areas, and their rights, were completely taken away, as citizens.
If the USA, is under this threat, of terrorism, and it is not fabricated, by our govrnment, Then I would agree with any decision to block groups from marching, because they can interfere with our security, or they could be used to draw attention away from the threat of terrorism.
if You are going to rob a bank you draw the attention of the police away from that target. may be bad example.
We cannot have disruptions or diversions, during a threat of a terrorist attack. if our government will shoot down any plane that does not obey orders, what will stop the government from taking other restrictive, prohibitive, and deadly actions?.

Answer 6

What is rense?

I am kind of surprised it could post stuff that starts with: "Classification: Top Secret-Noforn as of 1 June 2007"

on the internet... .....


Hay, you know it does look a lot like a copy and paste of a FM

Answer 7

I read the order top to bottom -- I didn't see anything stating that cops would be shooting at protesters. Most of it dealt with Iraq, and banned funding or supplying terrorists with information. Unless you plan on doing these things, you don't have anything to worry about.

Answer 8

LOL....www.rense.com...the tip of the spear when it comes to breaking news. I wonder how they got their hot little hands on that "Classified" 900 page document? Some people will believe anything they read.

Answer 9

It has NOTHING to do with Bush.....It is the Democrats who are wanting to bring our troops out of Iraq that will cause the war to come here. Remember 9/11? They've already proved they would.......

Answer 10

people protest everyday against bush the government and everything else under the sun. if people get violent in their protest then yes they need to be quelled by force if necessary. protest should by non violent in nature. if they get violent then you get what you give.