For the most part, I think that they're beautiful. Although, like the first answer stated, it depends on the context. Also, if they're too big and fake, they're not so beautiful...
2007-07-19 06:07:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Whooosh! 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on the context. If it's in art or a body of someone you find beautiful= beautiful body art. However, if it's show in a vulger way or in a situation that's unappropriate= pornographic.
2007-07-19 03:01:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Eric O 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
it depends on how u look at it...if u r surfing to look at multiple pics then it could b pornographic. otherwise i think of the human body mostly a womans as art created perfectly..
2007-07-19 04:18:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Niether. They can be beautiful in a work of art if they are part of the whole "picture" so to speak. They exist to sustain life as in feeding a child, people tend to forget that, such as your question implies as in that's all they are for: pornography or art.
2007-07-19 03:28:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by foodieNY 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
there is NOTHING about the body that is pornographic. it is in how it is displayed, and presented that can make it pornographic. i would think that give the right camera angles, and motifs, any picture could become 'pornographic.'
2007-07-22 23:52:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Daniel F 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Breasts are what they are. They have been sexualized by society and the media. I think all breasts are beautiful because they are simply part of human beings.
2007-07-19 03:02:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Buttercup 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
it depends on how they're..portrayed? (for lack of a better word) a beautiful naked woman in a nice pose(not spread eagle), i think of as artistic photography. even if just the breast is in the pic, it can be interesting. anything else though is tacky.
2007-07-19 03:19:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by racer 51 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
(1) Food source for babies.
(2) Beautiful body feature for women
(3) Porn only when men are mistreating women and women are allowing themselves to be mistreated.
2007-07-19 03:20:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by sparki777 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Porn, by definition, involves depictions of the sex act. Simply showing this or that body part doesn't qualify.
2007-07-19 04:45:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Babylons are baby feeders.
2007-07-19 03:42:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by Pacifica 6
·
1⤊
0⤋