1. Is it true that grocery store film developers developing film can turn a picture of an underaged girl involved in a sexual act over to the police, or would that be invasion of privacy?
2. Don't most grocery stores photo labs adopt the policy of not developing inappropriate pictures (ex. nude pictures of legal girls).
2007-07-19 00:21:30 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Photography
1. If you bring film to a store, a public place to be developed you cannot have the expectation of privacy, therefor yes they can and will turn it over to police.
2. Each lab will have its own policy on this.
3. I'm guessing the "Hottie" from your school said yes and you figure you ll get you a disposable camera and shoot some souvenirs. Well, kiddie porn is kiddie porn even if the kiddies make it themselves. Your old enough to know better, that's why your here asking questions, you are not smart enough to figure out the logistics of your little porno scheme. I recommend dropping the whole idea, leaving the poor girl alone and practicing restraint until you are ready for this sort of thing. Obviously you only think sex is for your own thrills or you wouldn't think of taking pictures of under aged girls.
2007-07-19 07:09:22 · answer #1 · answered by steven v 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. it is not an invasion of privacy to contact the authorities if a photo technician finds photos of an underage girl involved in sexual acts. Underage girls in sexual acts is a legitimate public concern which will trump most if not all invasion of privacy laws.
2. yes they do adopt such policies but in some cases it is up to the person developing the photos whether they find it appropriate to develop the photos or not.
2007-07-19 03:57:44 · answer #2 · answered by wackywallwalker 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In over 12 years of photo lab work, I have involved law enforcement three times. There are procedures in place for reporting underage subjects, drugs, crime etc etc.
One lab I worked for would not print nudity, but in the others, adult nudity was all right, men or women, but no sexual contact.
I don't see as much stuff like that as I used to, people keep that sort of content on digital cameras now and not film.
2007-07-19 03:14:14 · answer #3 · answered by Ara57 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Use to work at such a lab and this was our policy:
photos of suspected underage nudes whether in sex act or not were turned over to police. Photos of clothed underage performing any kind of sexual act were turned over to the police.
photos of obvious adults in nude were ok as long as they were not engaged in any sexual act. Go figure.
Of the thousands of rolls of film I processed had only one with nudity, adult, and one with two people in sex act.
2007-07-19 00:40:16 · answer #4 · answered by Moose 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Take your camera to a real photo lab -call around and make sure they have a real darkroom- and have them unload the film in the darkroom and either develop the film right there traditionally or reload it into the canister and run it through the auto-processor.
2016-04-01 01:30:55 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To answer your second question, they need to develop the film before they know if it's inappropriate.
2007-07-19 03:02:07 · answer #6 · answered by Brian Ramsey 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
just hand them into the police photo lab they will do them for you . You can even wait in a cell while they are doing them.
they take about thirty years.
2007-07-19 00:27:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Are you kidding? Why would you need to know something like this?
Both answers are yes, you freak.
2007-07-19 00:24:16 · answer #8 · answered by Raiveran Rabbit 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1. yes they can.
2. yes. they will develop boobs and vagina's usually but no penis'. sexist world.
2007-07-19 00:24:55 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
business is business as they say
2007-07-19 00:28:14 · answer #10 · answered by gemini 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋