we took our neighbours cat from a few houses away, because it had flea's, flea rash, it was thin, covered in scabs, starving etc. we took it to my aunt cause she used to be part of the cats protection league so they should be able to take it in to look after it.
so far it's been flea'ed etc so it doesn't have flea's anymore and it's coat is already looking healthier.
the question is, were we right to rescue this cat?
2007-07-18
23:03:16
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Pets
➔ Cats
no we did not tell them we were taking him.
they say it's under a vet at the moment for a "heart murmer" but it's now been checked out by a vet, who could not believe how bad a condition it was in.
It had been locked outside, with no shelter, no food, no water...
apparently tho they treated their last cat the same, and it died, being underweight, covered in scabbs and fleas.
just a week being fed properly and looked after has brightened him up.
depending on how long the vet thinks the cat has left and the results of the blood tests.
If it's going to live indefinatley then my aunt will probably let the cats protection rehome it, or something, if he's "on his last legs" then my aunt would probably keep him.
he's alot happier and more alert too now.
I know we did it the wrong way, but I don't think anything would have improved if we'd spoken to them about it, they'd had the RSPCA out before too.
2007-07-19
00:11:00 ·
update #1