Hi,
I can answer your question by a simple answer 'NO'. But we can save the Earth by bringing into existence the Society which is described at length in a book 'Shall we save the Earth?. In this book the author has also told that although it is not possible to stop the effects of global warming, still by adopting certain measures highlighted in the book, the effects can be postponed by another 50 years. The book is available at the following link:
http://www.authorhouse.com/BookStore/ItemDetail.aspx?bookid=45020
Kindly read the book and you will be saved.
2007-07-20 03:14:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Benedict F 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well there is no thought on the wiping out of the human race. But, have you thought about climate change shifting rainfall patterns that (possibly) might make Africa a bountifully food grower and North America too dry to grow crops?
2007-07-21 15:36:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yea, just like the world was going to come to an end on Jan 1, 2000 from the Y2K bug.
Sorry, people have been predicting the end of the world since the beginning of time. These yahoo's are no different.
In 2050, we'll look back and laugh at the people who thought "global warming" was real.
2007-07-19 02:12:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dr Jello 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
when scientists talk about serious global warming they only mean a few degrees and a few feet at maximum of sea level rise, there is no way that all the people of the world will be affected by it, there are other circumstances that can play an effect but i doubt they will. people of the heartland will be ok but food and population crises might be a factor. we do need to save ourselves just for insurance and the satisfaction of a safe and secure life here on earth but global warming has been pumped up on "steroids" by the media
although it is a real event it probably won't be as catastrophic as they say it will be.
2007-07-18 19:49:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by bleh 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
No climate report produced by responsible scientists says any thing like this. You must be listening to ELFs or some one else of their ilk.
2007-07-20 12:37:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yopur tin hat needs a new lead liner.
It was predicted in the 1950's that we'd nuke the world to inhabitability by the 1970's.
It was predicted in the 1970's that we would cause enough global cooling to make the world inhabitable by 1990
Now we have the global warming scaremongers.
Get a grip.
2007-07-18 23:31:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Global warming will not kill us all, or even most of us.
But, unreduced global warming would still be a disaster. Moving people away from the coasts, redoing farms and irrigation systems, and replacing things lost to coastal flooding, will cost huge sums of money. The resulting economic Depression will make the 1930s look like good times.
There are other effects. More details here:
http://www.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUSL052735320070407
http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM6avr07.pdf
It's not necessary to exaggerate the results of unreduced global warming. The reality is bad enough.
We can reduce it enough to cope. Here's the plan:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,481085,00.html
http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM040507.pdf
2007-07-18 19:25:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bob 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
I think we will find global warming is due to the sun burning a little hotter. You can't raise money to change the sun, so we focus on CO2. By the way water vapor is a much worse greenhouse gas than CO2, so lets stop people drinking coffee and tea and save the planet. LOL!
2007-07-18 19:43:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by johnsgec 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
2050? I am cashing out the 401k, and live for today.
2007-07-21 19:40:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by John C 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to the Aztec calendar, we will all experience obliteration in the year 2012. So we have nothing to worry about.
2007-07-18 20:25:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋