In my opinion, piecing together the news from different mediums, it seems that Iran, Russia, China, and North Korea are sitting back and awaiting the time when the terrorists have stretched our resources thin, so they can move in for the kill. I have noticed that Russia has been quietly making the move back towards communism and their "glory days" of the USSR, and keeping close ties to China, North Korea, and Iran. They have thumbed their noses at the world community more than once and have done absolutely nothing, actually quite the opposite of helping (supplied technology and even arguably military equipment) , with the war on global terrorism. What do you guys think?
2007-07-18
16:24:00
·
10 answers
·
asked by
jbbrant1
4
in
Politics & Government
➔ Military
a good question, and very possible so , China is one country no one can predict their plans nor allegiance, that is why they are called tricky, and these damned experts are no better at predicting their position than you or I
2007-07-18 16:30:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by james w 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
I dont think you are crazy but it would not make much sense for large nations like China, North Korea, and Iran to face our country in an Axis/Allied enemy stand point. It would take far more military power then these nations presently combined to even consider military action against our country. Our Military technology, political influence and armed forces not to mention our geographic isolation from all these nations are all strategically placed and structured so such an even could never happen. An attack on the U.S. if even it were successfully defeated would lead to years and years of civil war by the American people. Americans by nature are rebellious. If in the end the sum doesn't justify the means then you would have to really ask yourself is it really worth it?The United States and China have long been partners of economic trade. War between either of them would devastate both nations. How would the three benefit from a nation that would rebel long after its been defeated/ occupied. Start from your answers end and work backwards. If even they did, and no one rebelled against new order, who would that order be? Three nations never help another nation gain anything without something. I think in time we are slowly learning this from the war in Iraq. A nation also rebellious at heart. Despite how things might look in the middle east, U.S. resources haven't been stretched thin, just the opposite in fact.
2007-07-18 17:05:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Enlighten Me 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Iran is a problem but has a lack of infrastructure for an assault. China is powerful, but they aren't necessarily imperialistic. They have also never been that cozy with Russia. Russia has the people, but not the money or the refined resources. Plus, the U.S.S.R.'s "glory days" were mired in poverty. North Korea is suffering a famine, so they would be ill-advised to do anything.
With all of that said, the U.S. needs to change courses in many foreign affairs.
2007-07-18 16:40:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by ryanltz 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
i think of you want greater counsel. first and foremost, over the previous days of the administration of Bush the Elder, a unfastened commerce zone grow to be set up interior the Tumin River Delta. it particularly is the undemanding border factor the place China, North Korea and Russia meet. So, in a fashion, they have their very very own little version of NAFTA happening. Secondly, the Russian Federation grow to be actively combating Salafist Jihadist terrorists in Chechnya long earlier the attack on united states of america. the comparable with China in coping with the East Turkmenistan Liberation front and the Huger militants interior the area close to their nuclear testing facility at Lop Nor. Russia and China are 2 of the six events in touch in defusing the themes with North Korea. Russia may be heading in the direction of a totalitarian regime. yet, they'll in no way grow to be communist back. In decrease than ten years, a technology would be working Russia who're incredibly soft with the hazards and rewards of an open financial equipment. Iran is an issue to Russia by using fact it borders that united states of america. there is likewise some information which shows Tehran's energetic help of those terrorists in Chechnya. T use a word from "The Godfather", Russian counsel with Iran's nuclear potential courses is "in simple terms business enterprise". shifting Iran from a fossil gasoline potential equipment to nuclear is crucial to evade inner horrors in that land whilst they exhaust their crude oil materials in approximately two decades. Given their previous history, how lots oil do you think of the Arabs are going to sell to the Persians?
2016-10-09 01:03:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by neher 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your right my friend,thing is though that these other countries don't realize.Our sources are never to thin,we like them to think so.We Americans have a trump card that the world trembles over.We have used Nukes,and we won't hesitate in doing so again when necessary!Hoo=aah God bless America!!
2007-07-18 16:31:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by one10soldier 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think war would be very high on any country's wish list. With Nuclear weapons and the strongest military known to man, it would be foolish to go to war with the U.S.
What would either country gain by a war?
2007-07-18 16:31:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think you have the rudimentary skills and understanding of geopolitical interaction that require you to do a little more exploring of the subject. I was being nice.
2007-07-18 16:28:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by booman17 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
That's too intelligent of a question for Y@h00 answers.
The U.N. has never been in short supply of their criticisms of the U.S. I wouldn't be surprised if they were waiting.
2007-07-18 16:29:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
your crazy
2007-07-18 16:28:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
YOUR CRAZY
2007-07-18 16:28:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by LAVADOG 5
·
0⤊
2⤋