Am I just crazy or does anybody else see a conspiracy here?

Question

In my opinion, piecing together the news from different mediums, it seems that Iran, Russia, China, and North Korea are sitting back and awaiting the time when the terrorists have stretched our resources thin, so they can move in for the kill. I have noticed that Russia has been quietly making the move back towards communism and their "glory days" of the USSR, and keeping close ties to China, North Korea, and Iran. They have thumbed their noses at the world community more than once and have done absolutely nothing, actually quite the opposite of helping (supplied technology and even arguably military equipment) , with the war on global terrorism. What do you guys think?

Answer 1

It's a brave new world. And gw is leading it! LOL what a joke, I think you are right and we are screwed.

Answer 2

I think you need more information. First of all, during the last days of the administration of Bush the Elder, a free trade zone was set up in the Tumin River Delta. That's the common border point where China, North Korea and Russia meet. So, in a way, they have their own little version of NAFTA going on. Secondly, the Russian Federation was actively fighting Salafist Jihadist terrorists in Chechnya long before the attack on America. The same with China in dealing with the East Turkmenistan Liberation Front and the Huger militants in the area near their nuclear testing facility at Lop Nor. Russia and China are two of the six parties involved in defusing the problems with North Korea.
Russia may be heading towards a totalitarian regime. But, they will never become communist again. In less than ten years, a generation will be running Russia who are quite comfortable with the risks and rewards of an open economy.
Iran is a problem to Russia because it borders that country. There's also some evidence which shows Tehran's active support of those terrorists in Chechnya. T use a phrase from "The Godfather", Russian assistance with Iran's nuclear energy programs is "just business". Moving Iran from a fossil fuel energy system to nuclear is imperative to avoid internal horrors in that land when they exhaust their crude oil supplies in about 20 years. Given their past history, how much oil do you think the Arabs are going to sell to the Persians?

Answer 3

I think China has never attacked another country cept in 78 when the attacked n, vietnam--another commie country.

If these other country werent sitting back, what would they be doing? YOU evidently dont know sir--- "terrioism" is a stupid joke played on stupid americans ONLY! (WELL, 1/2 of england too)

so uv noticed (?)russia 'quietly moving back to commie?" toooo funnny.
hv u notice "any" countries arrogantly attacking and invading other countries.

>>They (russia) have thumbed their noses at the world community <<<
"The world community?" you mean us and 1/2 of england are the world community?

>>>> the USSR, .... keeping close ties to China, North Korea, and Iran. <<<<
Yea, the whole world is watching us!

>>>>>> They (russia) have thumbed their noses at the world community <<<<<
you mean the U.S. AND ENGLAND?

>>>>>> and have done absolutely nothing, actually quite the opposite of helping <<<<<

Help? You see, the WORLD doesent think we are--or intend--to "help".

What do you guys think?
I think the "bushbunch" are nutso!

Answer 4

I dont think of you're loopy in spite of the shown fact that it does not make lots experience for great international locations like China, North Korea, and Iran to stand our u . s . a . in an Axis/Allied enemy stand element. it would take lots greater protection stress capability then those international locations presently mixed to even evaluate protection stress action against our u . s . a .. Our protection stress technologies, political effect and militia to not point out our geographic isolation from lots of those international locations are all strategically placed and based so such a good ought to by no ability take place. An attack on the U.S. if even it have been effectively defeated might deliver approximately years and years of civil war by ability of the yank human beings. individuals by ability of nature are rebellious. If interior the top the sum would not justify the flexibility then you definately might would desire to truly ask your self is it extremely properly worth it?america and China have long been companions of financial commerce. war between the two of them might devastate the two international locations. How might the three earnings from a rustic that could insurrection long after its been defeated/ occupied. start up out of your solutions end and paintings backwards. If even they did, and no person rebelled against new order, who might that order be? 3 international locations by no ability help yet another u . s . a . benefit something with out some thing. i think of in time we are slowly getting to understand this from the war in Iraq. A u . s . a . additionally rebellious at coronary heart. inspite of how issues might look interior the middle east, U.S. components have not been stretched skinny, only the alternative in certainty.

Answer 5

There's always a conspiracy or a coverup. What you hear is what they want you to hear. 50 years from now we're going to hear how 911 was a CIA operation.

Answer 6

It's plausible, but if you are even a fration of corrrect we are screwed.

Answer 7

Help who??