English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

...would you also reject chemotherapy, because that goes against nature? Or antibiotics and penicillin? Surgery? What about synthetic clothing? Flying in an airplane?

Are you against all things that go against nature, or just the things that are convinient to hate?

2007-07-18 12:23:39 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

38 answers

That was a really good point!

2007-07-18 12:26:26 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 8 5

homosexuality goes against comfort, and those things you listed are not even proportionately similar.

chemotherapy and antibiotics are more like the effort for you to tear away from the madness of homosexuality, despite a moment of discomfort toward a peacable end. Surgery cannot always repair anal destruction, and if it can, it doesn't hurt forever. Synthetic clothing, if it isn't modest, is evil. If it is bad for skin, it is worth scrapping, but it isn't interaction with such a complex thing as another's soul. Flying in an airplane is no different than lifting your spoon all the way up to your mouth. You weren't already doing it, but it doesn't hurt your natural peculiarities at all.

2007-07-18 12:44:01 · answer #2 · answered by Travis J 3 · 1 1

Bit of a fallacy there. Chemotherapy and all the medicines you list, clothing, etc. are all aids to living. Humans use tools and live very UNnaturally, and a good thing too!

But a person can live perfectly all right by forever avoiding any homosexual acts. It is a frill, never a necessary thing. And if we stop being so darned Eurocentric and include the opinions of our Islamic and African brothers, we come up with the tally that over 99% of human beings avoid homosexual acts with the greatest of ease.

Religious people oppose homosexuality because they say it is an evil. But Atheists woul reject it because it is illogical, or ridiculous. Whatever. As for claims it is "found in nature" that is often with a spin put on it by homosexuals themselves. The journal SCIENCE, decades ago, had an article on "Lesbian Mounting by Gibbons" but found it had nothing to do with homosexuality at all. The bigger female gibbons were humiliating the smaller ones with simulated sex. Not a love relationship, not even sexual pleasure. Yet homosexual activists like to point to this and other instinctual misfirings as justifying HUMAN homosexuality. No it doesn't, it's just a justification for bullying in nature if anything!

2007-07-18 12:29:30 · answer #3 · answered by PIERRE S 4 · 3 4

God said so in the Bible that it is wrong. Not because it goes againstt nature, but because marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God. Antibiotics and penicillin and such do go against nature, but these things are ok with God.

2007-07-18 12:50:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Regardless of what many think, homosexuality is not against nature. Whatever man does is natural in the sense that man is a part of nature. Whatever man or animal does in this world is natural because we are all nature. Now being a little odd is another story.

2007-07-18 12:31:07 · answer #5 · answered by Spade, Sam Spade 6 · 3 1

Antibiotics (funny you chose to mention that one), chemo., etc were the inventions of necessity and truely have positive, even life saving effects on humanity. Your comparison is what?
You wish to clump in homosexuality on the basis of...?
To TRY and legitimize a perversion?
Nice try.
So...in thirty years, you're going jump in on the pedophile or incest bandwagon because you will be so "progressive and enlightened" to the hypothesis that they are "just wired that way" too? PLEASE!
Hate? Did you just say...HATE? LOL
Listen, just because I call someones' actions unnatural and immoral, does not constitute "hate". I have no ill feelings towards homosexuals, they can be however they want to be. But that doesn't mean I have to agree with them forcing it in my face with their "gay pride" stupidity or public acts of puke-inducing sex. Like any sex, it should be left at home.
I tell people this, "...just because I walk around dog s**t, does't mean I hate it, I just don't like the way it smells".

2007-07-18 12:47:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I don't think any of that stuff goes against nature.
Pollution goes against nature.
Love is a natural thing regardless of person, place or thing.

2007-07-18 13:59:56 · answer #7 · answered by ♣Hey jude♣ 5 · 0 1

What in the world does being gay have to do with modern medicine? Is your gayness saving any lives? Does being gay save you from cancer, Aids, std's, heart attacks? Seems the only thing its saving you from is common sense.

The only thing I have against gays is that they come into the religious/spiritual section with this insipid nonsense. If you're gay, you're gay, why try to make that my problem? I have my own sins to deal with, why are you guys constantly trying to make your gayness everyone else's problem?

2007-07-18 12:34:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

God says homosexuality is an abomination. All the other things are not listed unless you are abusing them to try to get high on purpose. God wants you to stay sober so keep from alcohol and drugs. Dont mix up medicine with drug addictions.

2007-07-18 12:39:31 · answer #9 · answered by Ms DeeAnn 5 · 1 1

What irks me is how something unnatural can exist within a universe that is by definition, natural. Seriously, if nature abhors a vaccuum, imagine what it must do to the unnatural...

2007-07-18 12:26:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

In Jesus' true ministry it was not about homosexuality it was and is all about our spirituality.

Christians you were warned by Jesus that the false teachers would fool if possible even the elect..

see web.. Christians believe it or not

2007-07-18 12:38:19 · answer #11 · answered by john 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers