even a rat will learn not to run into the electrified fence to get the chese on the other side eventurally.
2007-07-18 04:33:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
What I love is how they ask Pascal's Wagers questions specifically to Atheists and say I really want your opinion. Then they give the best answer to someone who writes "I love Jesus with all my heart" or "I am already a Christian".
I don't think it is possible to evolve when you are unable to learn anything new.
BTW- Thanks for the drink! The next round is on me!
2007-07-18 04:35:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Pangloss (Ancora Imparo) AFA 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
if God=h both sum up to 8
then christian=c god rist i a n
what is n
n 's roots if n=I4 as I IIII =IIII I then it's Me.
if n is a I7 then perhaps it's His birthday or if n represents a .I7 mixed up and sealed together ie Stevens.n then it's Me guess i must have put forward 1000 points yet? the most famous 1000 points of Lite(LIT) yet ever divised by one Man alone with no help from anyone. n=I4 try root of 14 and see its
root 14=3.74165 aka C.G DAFE which was the night i signed a paper DAFFY DUCK in the middle of a RAT=DAT l\(ie DATE Lie which i also did that night since i didn't agree with what was in the statement also i was severly drunk) is it legal in Canada to get an obviously drunk man sing a police statement?
2007-07-18 04:46:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lord of all Earth 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
As people are introduced to Pascal's Wager for the first time, and assume that no one has encountered it before, they will toss it in as a brilliant and irrefutable argument, so I'm certain we will be seeing it soon.
2007-07-18 04:35:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
The problem with pascals wager is it teaches no one to have a personal relationship with God. We are the instruments to experience God. Yet we can not share that experience beyond our words. There for to experience God you your self must taste and see that the Lord is Good. Problem is many people wont even give him a chance and ignore the still small voice and heap before them those who tickle their ears with what they want to hear.
2007-07-18 04:38:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dustinthewind 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
well, it's raining out so no work today---I'll have a drink with y'all...is Bacardi in the morning a sin?
I saw someone discussing Pascal's wager on PBS yesterday---you know, that bastion of free-thinking anti-religious heathens...
2007-07-18 04:38:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Evolving? Sure. Who doesn't evolve when learning.
I hope that they aren't wasting their time on those who really have no interest. God doesn't want everybody after all. So why respond to the dead? The only reason why I I might respond to a 'dead' person is so that those that seek life might look and be encouraged by the answer.
Jesus referred to those I am calling 'dead' as 'blind'.
2007-07-18 04:34:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Christian Sinner 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Perhaps it;s better than learning not to ask... maybe they've learned that betting on the gods just to insure a ticket to heaven doesn't cut it.
But just in case... don't lose your favorite beer stein.
[][][] r u randy? [][][]
Post Script: I love this, the responder next to me insists she's not evolving... LOL. That's one more dud left in the ole primeval scum. Hey... I think we're gunna need a bigger pond.
.
2007-07-18 10:29:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I hate the taste of alcohol so here's a big diet Red Bull....
**drink**
I'm becoming a Y!A native! I'm adopting your folk traditions!
Blessed Be!
2007-07-18 04:35:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♥Gnostic♥ 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dont bank on it some of them are evolving very slowly[even in evolutionary terms].
2007-07-18 04:35:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋