How can you prove it doesnt exist?

Question

How can you believe that global warming doesnt exist even though theres proof that it does and yet you're willing to believe that god truly exists. You dont even believe it, in your eyes you know he does. Some of us just settle for believing he might, you say it like its a fact when there is no way to prove it. But yet you have evidence that global warming exists and yet you dont wanna believe it. Id give you evidence but then youll just b!tc# that its too long as you probably will by the end of this paragraph.

Seriously, can you prove that global warming DOESNT exist and prove that god DOES exist? Dont come up with this "who else made the universe crap"? Scientists got statistics and photos, you freaks just have a book which has been proven to be wrong ocassionally like the sun supposedly revolving around the earth even though its not true.

This only goes to those who totally deny global warming and that also act like they know for a fact that god exists. No offense to everyone else in between.

Answer 1

Very few people disput the fact that global warming exists. Some dispute the fact that humans are the primary contributor to the current global warming.

People believe in god because they're raised to believe it. If we taught kids better science, they'd believe the reality of global warming too.

Answer 2

Okay, sure, I like a challenge. So here goes:

The word religion means "to search for the source". The source of life: a purpose for existing. We anthropomorphize that idea and call it God. Whether or not you believe in religious texts, God = purpose and therefore the concept continues to exist in spite of organized religion, not because of it. People are leaving the church in record numbers, but they are still seeking God. They are still trying to find their individual purpose.

Global Warming is also an invented term. 30 years ago it was called the Greenhouse Effect, then Global Warming, then Climate Change, then Global Warming again. To avoid all the BS surrounding a name I call it "excess energy in the biosphere". So to me Global Warming is only two words that some people use to describe a concept and since those two words don't do a great job of it, I can choose to ignore the term, say it doesn't exist and call what is happening excess energy in the biosphere.

Ipso facto, God exists, Global Warming doesn't.

Answer 3

Read "The Politically Correct Guide to Global Warming" by Christopher C. Horner. You will soon find out that this is just part of a bigger idea to redistribute the wealth and turn the country into a communist one. I hope you like breadlines!

The government tried this argument thirty years ago: it was called "Global cooling" back then. The book references the article in Newsweek that featured how we were going to freeze to death. Today, we're going to burn.

Answer 4

People can believe what ever they choose to. If you believe in one God or ten Gods, it doesn't effect me.

However, your belief in so-called "global warming" does effect me, as my tax dollars are spent to study it, and laws are passed to change the way I live.

If you want to believe in "global warming" and change the light bulbs in your home, cycle to work, compost and recycle, that's fine. When you force me to do the same, I want to see proof like predicting the climate 6 month from now, 1 year, 5 years, and 10 years out before I will believe anything you say.

Answer 5

Why are you comparing Religion and Science, they are too separate issues, and, in this case, have nothing to do with each other. Global warming, is still being debated as their hasn't been conclusive proof that it exists because of the natural cycles of the earth, or as a result of what humans are doing. I tend to think that even if it is a natural cycle, that we can reduce the damage that we are doing to the earth, if only so that we dont' poison ourselves. Religion is another topic.

Answer 6

you do no longer could practice that your god exists for the reason which you have faith huh? Did you ever end to think of how illogical it somewhat is? What if I advised you i assumed in magic domestic canines that conceal in trees and dared you to coach they do no longer exist and then rotated and advised you i do no longer could have any info because of the fact golly gee I definitely believe. you will think of i became an escaping from the psychological wing of a wellness facility. there is many arguments against the lifestyles of gods. between the suitable ones is Occam's razor. Ever heard of it? No, I doubt you have. Occam's razor became formulated via William of Occam (1285-1349) and says: "Non est ponenda pluralites sive necessitate" or in english: "do no longer multiply entities except unavoidably". that's a thought for scientific labour meaning which you will use an straightforward clarification with some explanatory premises previously a extra complicated one. enable's say that each and everything could be created, and that became carried out via an all-powerful god. A god which stands above time, area, ethical and lifestyles, it somewhat is self containing and in it self has that's very own reason. This entity can somewhat get replaced via the favorite worldwide. the worldwide stands above time, area, ethical, lifestyles, is self containing and in it has that's very own meaning. maximum theists agree that god has a nature. Then we could strengthen the question, who created god's nature? If we in simple terms settle for that god has a nature and exists with no reason, why no longer say that the favorite worldwide in simple terms is and that the regulations of physics are what they are, with no reason? God won't be a proof, in straightforward terms a non-clarification. that's impossible to learn innovations from non-innovations so God as a proof is a lifeless end. as quickly as we've pronounced that the reason of something is that 'god did it that way' there is no thank you to comprehend it any extra. We in simple terms shrug our shoulders and settle for issues as they are. to describe the unknown via god is barely to describe the way it exceeded off, no longer why. If we are to look at the worldwide and build our perspectives of existence from the worldwide, we can not assume a god. because of the fact including god as a proof leaves as many, if not extra questions than it explains, god should be bumped off with Occam's razor if we are severe in investigating the worldwide.

Answer 7

As residents of this 'borrowed' Planet, we can only correct the mistakes left by the previous generations who buried everything into the ground, [including the kitchen sink]. But as for saving the Planet, we're just dust specks on a big rock. In the end, the planet will correct itself,
as it has done for billions of years. Just ask a dinosaur. It's fundamental.

Answer 8

How can you prove that humans cause global warming when it was warmer a thousand years ago than it is now? Several thousand years ago New York was buried under a mile of ice and yet it seems to have melted off without much help from humans. What makes you believe that the planet needs human help to have a warm spell when all the evidence is otherwise?

Answer 9

if someone doesn't believe in climate change from the burning of fossil fuels then tell them(someone like senator Inhofe) to run their car in the garage with the door closed for about 20 minutes to a hour and then i think they'll get the picture considering theres probably about 100 millions cars in the US alone
since everyone should know the ozone layer holds are atmosphere in so that gas can't escape.

Answer 10

Prove that it is man-made and disprove God does not exist.
Free Tibet.