In this revealing work, David Horowitz explores the hellish marriage between IslamoFascists and the highly networked American Left. These ideologues who once sided with the USSR and other repressive communist regimes have now wholeheartedly embraced radical Islam.
The agenda emanates from the extreme left but the influence extends far beyond, also encompassing liberal discourse and the mass media. It seems that this radical agenda has now succeeded in capturing the heart and soul of the Democratic Party.
Unholy Alliance exposes and dissects the Left in fine detail, seeking for answers to why it has made an alliance with a reactionary and oppressive religious ideology. Also why it tried to undermine the War on Terror by opposing the liberation of Afghanistan and Iraq. The fracture of the consensus in American politics is another topic discussed here.
It shows how the Left declared war on the War on Terror and started organising demonstrations long before any action was taken, becoming the vanguard for Saddam and the Jihad terrorists.
Unholy Alliance demonstrates convincingly that the American Left today is far more dangerous than loony
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=15316
2007-07-17 14:33:34 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Travel ➔ Italy ➔ Bologna
Horowitz's co-author Richard Poe..has a great interview on line..
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
A new book by David Horowitz and Richard Poe has enraged the Left and alarmed many conservatives. It exposes the machinations of a radical clique working at the highest levels of government and finance to undermine American power. That book is The Shadow Party: How George Soros, Hillary Clinton and Sixties Radicals Seized Control of the Democratic Party.
here's a link to an interview
2007-07-17 14:42:47 · answer #1 · answered by UMD Terps 3 · 5⤊ 4⤋
The political far left cannot see the world below them, because they live in ivory towers. Islam (not radical Islam, but Islam), is continuing to do what it has been doing since it's conception 1,300 years ago... spread.
2016-05-21 00:09:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That book belongs in a museum of extremist propaganda, right next to Mein Kampf and the works of Goebbels.
The unholy alliance was in the 1980's, between the USA and Saddam, and between the USA and Bin Laden. The utter hypocrisy in your argument is astounding.
You're obviously a right wing extremist. Your paranoid fear-mongering reeks of anti-Islam racism. The ones with the radical agenda are the US far right, whose imperialism has multiplied the terrorist numbers by a thousand.
Al Qaeda only attacked because of neo-con US imperialism in the middle east. Therefore, the far right is the biggest danger TO the US.
2007-07-17 16:31:12 · answer #3 · answered by atheist 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
The only Unholy Aliance is the Bush Administration. Their continuos bull**** about weapons of mass destruction, insurgents, and all of that idiocy of Iraq and Afghanistan just to pretend to catch Bin Laden, is the proof that Bush is lying to the world. He invaded Afghanistan because Al Quaeda and Bin Laden were hiding there. Next was Iraq, because Bin Laden is of Iraqi nationality, could of possably be hiding there. After 4 years of fighting, loss of American and Iraqi lives, millions of dollars invested on a "War on Terror" for nothing. Bush's main target in Iraq was Sadam Hussein, in other words, finishing his daddy's political agenda. The Bin Laden's and the Bush family go back way, way, back. Seriously, with Bush in the White House, the best way to maintain diplomatic relations in the Middle East (Al Quaeda) is to stay-off Bin Laden's back and that's what Bush is doing. He has lied to the country! He shou'ld be taken to impeachment trials. The Bush Administration is the most dangerous organization at this time.
2007-07-17 15:03:10 · answer #4 · answered by Zoe S. 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Funny, I don't remember the "left" selling chemical weapons to Saddam, arming Iran, training Bin Laden, and starting a war that is the biggest recruiting tool for terrrosism in the history of the U.S.
2007-07-17 14:54:02 · answer #5 · answered by Gemini 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Isn't this the same David Horowitz who keeps ranting on about bias in the universities but keeps getting debunked over it?
2007-07-17 16:34:48 · answer #6 · answered by ck4829 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
How else could you explain the constant attack on our President during a time of war....that encourages our enemy and probably has cost military lives....and THEN they cry "don't question my patriotism"!!!.....WHAT??...YOU BETTER BELIEVE I QUESTION YOUR PATRIOTISM!!...the left is doing everything in its power to under mind our efforts....they don't care about the troops....they don't care about the Iraq civilians that are being killed(mostly by their own, our troops take painstaking effort not to hurt civilians)THEY CARE ABOUT THEIR IDEOLOGY...and regaining power...THATS IT!!....you damn right I question their patriotism!!
2007-07-17 21:59:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Wasn't it this present Adm. that sent the family of binLaden back home right after 9/11? Why do that I wonder?
2007-07-17 14:37:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 6⤋
It is just his sensationalized opinion. It has no credibility with me because stereotyping people is a weak and illogical form of argument or way to prove a point. I just laugh at people who use stereotyping to convince me that their assertions are correct.
2007-07-17 14:40:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 6⤋
more neocon babbling!
no facts as usual just utter nonsense mixed with the most pathetic accusations to undermine and discredit the democratic party.
2007-07-17 14:41:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 7⤋