English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It sure seems like they do.

2007-07-17 07:02:57 · 18 answers · asked by gruz 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

18 answers

Creationists are at the bottom of the intellectual scale. They believe that only a couple of thousands years ago, human children had dinosaur pets.

Christians can yell and stomp their feet all they like, but this complete and utter lunacy is what they actually believe.

Padded cell anyone?

2007-07-17 07:29:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Im a creationist and if you wanna talk logic, the Evolutionists seem to think Life was created without an Intellegent Designer.

But look around can Houses build themselves, can Cars build themselves, can Computers build themselves? If you say no to all of these things then look at how bones and organs are inside of our body.

Would this be possible without an intellegent designer? I don't think so.

We had to have been created, and yes I believe in the Judeo-Christian doctrine of creation, but the creation stories from other faiths are much more believable than Evolution.

Even an Atheist proved Creation when his disbelief in God caused him to try proving Evolution and he proved Creation instead (but sadly he made up the Space Aliens created us theory).

2007-07-17 07:10:24 · answer #2 · answered by MrCool1978 6 · 0 1

No. Creationist are very logical thinking and full of common sense. They have a great belief in God and His creation. They are scientist also. Well educated in the knowledge of man and especially the knowledge of God's Word.

2007-07-17 07:13:06 · answer #3 · answered by Jeancommunicates 7 · 1 1

Not hardly.
Creationism displays the height of common sense.
I mean, who would find a gold watch
sitting on a table and think right away
"Oh, look at how nicely that watch
evolved from just some metal shavings."
But evolutionists look at this immensely
complicated and perfectly timed creation
every day with just such an attitude.
Sorry, but some intelligent designer made the watch,
and some Intelligent Designer made the universe, too!

2007-07-17 07:09:19 · answer #4 · answered by teetiger 6 · 1 1

‘Do not answer a fool according to his folly, lest you also be like him. Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own eyes.’Proverbs 26:4-5

Creationists and evolutionists, Christians and non-Christians all have the same evidence—the same facts. Think about it: we all have the same earth, the same fossil layers, the same animals and plants, the same stars—the facts are all the same.
The difference is in the way we all interpret the facts. And why do we interpret facts differently? Because we start with different presuppositions. These are things that are assumed to be true, without being able to prove them. These then become the basis for other conclusions. All reasoning is based on presuppositions (also called axioms). This becomes especially relevant when dealing with past events.
Past and present We all exist in the present—and the facts all exist in the present. When one is trying to understand how the evidence came about (Where did the animals come from? How did the fossil layers form? etc.), what we are actually trying to do is to connect the past to the present.
However, if we weren’t there in the past to observe events, how can we know what happened so we can explain the present? It would be great to have a time machine so we could know for sure about past events.
Christians of course claim they do, in a sense, have a ‘time machine’. They have a book called the Bible which claims to be the Word of God who has always been there, and has revealed to us the major events of the past about which we need to know.
On the basis of these events (Creation, Fall, Flood, Babel, etc.), we have a set of presuppositions to build a way of thinking which enables us to interpret the evidence of the present.
Evolutionists have certain beliefs about the past/present that they presuppose, e.g. no God (or at least none who performed acts of special creation), so they build a different way of thinking to interpret the evidence of the present.
Thus, when Christians and non-Christians argue about the evidence, in reality they are arguing about their interpretations based on their presuppositions.

2007-07-17 07:22:16 · answer #5 · answered by notthemamas1 4 · 0 1

Creation is purely logical, and can be discovered with common sense. Unfortunately, many don't know why they believe what they believe. They swallow information down whole, without truly examining the information.
Just like people that believe in evolution.

2007-07-17 07:11:00 · answer #6 · answered by Jed 7 · 1 1

it may seem like they do, but I think that many of them actually believe that everything you would ever need to know is in the bible. and they don't necessarily see the opposition as losers, but as evil. well then again they also believe that good will without any doubt prevail in the end, so I suppose you're right, they do think their opponents are losers.

2007-07-17 07:10:26 · answer #7 · answered by Ray Patterson - The dude abides 6 · 1 1

No. They do believe in logic. They fail to understand that their one premise, that there is a god that created everything, is not a universally acceptable premise.

2007-07-17 10:52:37 · answer #8 · answered by Fred 7 · 0 0

I think it's more like they're being as logical as they can while baseing their precepts on the bible or some other ancient book. To them we look illogical for rejecting god and jesus or muhammad. They think we must be stupid or evil for not seriously considering Pascal's wager. LOL

2007-07-17 07:12:15 · answer #9 · answered by RealRachel 4 · 0 1

Well that shows that you do not know all those who are creationists

Your logic is illogical and it is a blanket statement showing your own ignorance.

2007-07-17 07:10:54 · answer #10 · answered by ? 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers