Bin Laden didn't say anything??? Are you deaf and blind, as well as ignorant and totally lacking in long-term memory? Didn't you see the videotapes released by al-Jazeera within hours of the attacks showing bin Laden gloating over the destruction of the WTC???
The President and VP are almost always separated, and in different states of preparedness/shelter. This is so they can't both be taken out simultaneously by some nutcase(s) trying to overthrow the Government. Duh!! Just like Soldiers in the field staying a few meters apart at all times to prevent an entire squad from being taken out by a single grenade.
Un-flipping-believable that, in this day and age, people can remain so utterly ignorant and abjectly stupid.
2007-07-17 03:15:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dave_Stark 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
http://www.nowpublic.com/vancouver_911_conference_grave_warning
They are still talking about it...here is an excerpt from the Vancouver 911 conference held in June 2007:
"The 9/11 report only lies in certain places. . . there is a pattern: a diminishment of the role played by Cheney on that day." Scott cites [former Secretary of Transportation] Norman Minetta's testimony that Cheney was in the White House bunker by 9:20; 9/11 commission simply ignored it, and reported instead that he arrived shortly before 10."
Cheney himself told the press five days after 9/11 that he had arrived in the bunker before the Pentagon was hit. He later changed his account. "One of the accounts has to be wrong. Should we believe this man when he comes before us and says we should go to war with Iran? I think we need more information about the first thing he told us."
"If he was in the bunker before 9:37, he had time to issue all the salient commands on that morning."
A second thought here: You might enjoy these videos
http://www.speak911truthtopower.com/articles.html#whereabouts
2007-07-17 09:31:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
All the "facts" have been brought up before and been debunk every which way possible when taken in the context of reality.
I can understand why a few nuts believe that garbage but when 1/3 of the democrats believe it. It worries me that people will do anything or say anything to avoid the reality of Muslim terrorists.
2007-07-17 09:24:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Because this Administration has already played the 9-1-1 card to death, literally, & has initiated this war on false information and fear tactics related to this horrific American tragedy.
2007-07-17 09:27:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Ugh, here we go. You may have inadvertantly opened up pandora's box of conspiracy theorists just WAITING for a question like this. Duck and cover!
2007-07-17 09:18:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
I always did think it was odd that Cheney was already in the bunker... I suppose it just goes to show you how that they knew SOMETHING was up.
2007-07-17 09:11:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
A lot of people have brought up these events and tried to tie them to conspiracy theories, most of which have been disproven.
2007-07-17 09:11:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by guess 5
·
5⤊
1⤋
Isn't that an interesting point to make. Really makes you wonder what(or who) was involved in all that.....more and more is it becoming apparent that "terrorism" is just a cover word for "lets go to Iraq and Iran and secure some oil for us"
2007-07-17 09:16:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by ButwhatdoIno? 6
·
0⤊
4⤋
I am sure teh VEEP spends a lot of time in bunkers. You know, the sun hurts him.
2007-07-17 09:13:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
Maybe cause it all is pure toilet fodder
2007-07-17 10:09:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋