English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

All the expressways, parkways, highways will be overcapacity, there will be bumper to bumper accidents. So forget about driving.

Airports will be jammed packed. No MAJOR metropilitan area has been evacuated EXCEPT Houston with Rita, but the NYC metro has over 5 times as many people.

Well, you people hve fun making your plans, I'm safe in central Pennsylvania. You people don't come here, there is already too much traffic. Go to Boston or something.

2007-07-16 13:48:34 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Travel United States New York City

13 answers

You are radically overestimating the amount of people who will need to be evacuated because it quite clear that you don't understand the topography of the region.
If you did understand the topography & history of the region you would have known that the hurricane of 1938 (?) that created Shinnecock Inlet ,proceded to travel up the coast and do some serious damage to the Boston area. So Boston is not an option for evacuation.
Re-post this question after you understand the subject matter better

2007-07-16 16:25:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

stable question, Fonzie (and you're suited, Earl became no pearl of a typhoon with the help of the time he drew on the component of New England!) How approximately those: hurricane Spiro - rejected because of the fact it must be in straightforward terms a nattering nabob of negativity hurricane gas Guzzler - rejected because of the fact each and every time forecasters tried to apply the call, the typhoon ran out of gas hurricane Aesop - with the help of nature, Hurricanes have not any morals hurricane Schwarzenegger - good, a hurricane is purely noted as a hurricane if it originated in the Tropics Edit: hey Vapor Trails!!

2016-09-30 03:51:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In all my life, there has never been anything serious enough to evacuate NYC due to hurricanes/flloding. However, if such were to occur, i would stay right at home! Not all of NYC is close to sea level, only really downtown Manhattan, Staten Island and parts along the shore of Long Island including Brooklyn and Queens. Considering all routes would be jammed, i would just stay home. I live in Washington Heights way uptown Manhattan which is well above sea level. I have enough food and supplies as well as a bicycle to cross the nearby George Washington Bridge to go to Jersey and eventually upstate New York.

Trust me, no one wants to go to philly. we new yorkers are not afraid of a flood, we would just go about our business as usual and im sure one of us would be out there trying to make a buck off of the whole ordeal

2007-07-17 00:58:49 · answer #3 · answered by Nooka 5 · 2 0

Sorry - but you're gonna have to make room. I'm in Philly, so if a hurricane hits, I'll be camped out in your back yard.

2007-07-16 13:51:38 · answer #4 · answered by randomobject2003 2 · 2 0

Ride it out from the fortieth floor of my building. Don't worry, wouldn't dream of visiting you in central PA, too provincial clearly.

2007-07-16 14:19:44 · answer #5 · answered by kikipops 2 · 3 3

Surfing.

2007-07-16 13:50:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Sounds like you've got it all figured out genius!!!
Maybe your next question can make you a hero too!

2007-07-16 13:52:21 · answer #7 · answered by crankyissues 6 · 0 2

To the beach and have a hurricane party.

2007-07-16 13:51:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

I'd stay right here in Central Louisiana. 2D

2007-07-16 13:54:09 · answer #9 · answered by 2D 7 · 1 2

There's never been a hurricane in Detroit.

2007-07-16 13:51:46 · answer #10 · answered by T Leeves 6 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers