English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

That's like asking which counts a bad weather -- a snow storm or a tornado. It's not an either-or question.

Generally, the system acts against the accused. So, generally, one the accused is harmed by the system.

The victim is usually harmed by the accused. However, there are countless cases where the victim was also harmed by the system.

So, it's not an either-or question. Both can occur, in different ways.

2007-07-16 06:34:08 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 1 2

Our offender justice gadget is determined as much as safeguard the accused. harmless till shown in charge, probably reason, due technique, trial by utilising jury, data previous a lifelike doubt. There are motives the gadget is determined up this variety. Are the sufferer's rights served if the incorrect individual is arrested and jailed? of course not. The sufferer's sensibilities are considered necessary interior the offender justice gadget. they have a splendid to work out justice executed. however the regulation can't 'fulfill' the sufferer's rights on the rate of the rights of the accused. we won't arrest, convict and reformatory a individual without probably reason and due technique. whilst the gadget won't be able to fulfill those burdens then criminals go unpunished. it somewhat is an injustice. yet without due technique, then those in power can do something they want to those without power. which would be a some distance extra desirable injustice.

2017-01-21 05:31:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

At this moment, the trend sems to be toward the accused. This is because the judges don't want a conviction to be thrown out or overturned due to lack of some right not being enforced, so they do what they can to ensure his rights are protected. This makes the conviction stick and less likely he'll win an appeal.

I don't like it, but I understand it.

2007-07-16 07:39:40 · answer #3 · answered by Witch Hazel 2 · 0 0

The victims. Too many loop holes. Let a murderer walk because of a stupid law like Miranda, or not having a warrant for the murder weapon when searching for something else but find it? I have seen cases where I live that is unbelievably stupid. A case was thrown out because the meth house that got busted was white instead of yellow as the warrant stated even though the address was correct. Too many deals made etc.

2007-07-16 06:37:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Depends on the case and the people invoved. Personally I think the justice system put many inocent people there rather that true criminals. (Note: If anyone thinks I'm not right then OK!!!!) (sorry not in a good mood today)

2007-07-16 06:56:17 · answer #5 · answered by Necromancer 2 · 0 0

You have asked this six times now. Why do you keep asking it? What answer are you looking for?

2007-07-16 06:40:23 · answer #6 · answered by Dog Lover 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers