English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. Thinning of the ozone, due to the American auto a/c? What a joke that was. 2. The world is headed for another ice age. (Make up your mind)
3. We can eliminate the poor if the rich will pay their fair share? Clinton taxed the crap out of the successful, we still have poor.
4. It’s the stingy DR. Fault that everyone can’t afford to have insurance. Let’s try to be like the UK, maybe we can get our own group of socialized terrorist to “heal us” 5. That’s not a baby, it’s just a blob of tissue. While the child screams and tries it best to except the butcher’s blades in the abortion mill. 6. The spotted owl is too important to damage its native home. What about the ones building their nest in the “native” satellite dishes?
7. A condom in high school will make all the problems go away. If not we got a number for a good abortion DR. But my favorite--- “we are going to have the most ethical and transparent congress the people have ever had” Ms. Polozyi.

2007-07-16 05:40:59 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Environment Other - Environment

Yeah right.
Lies upon lies upon lies, so how many did you fall for?

2007-07-16 05:41:10 · update #1

12 answers

You are right and some of the things they have done about the war should got them put in prison.

2007-07-16 07:58:40 · answer #1 · answered by JOHNNIE B 7 · 0 0

1. Thinning of the ozone layer did happen, until we banned CFCs.

2. Science gets things wrong, but it keeps getting better each time. There was never a worldwide consensus on a new ice age.

3. Clinton never said we'd eliminate the poor by taxing the rich. LBJ did.

4. Way way too simplified to even comment, but generally I agree with you on this one.

5. Typical arrogance - you know for sure that a piece of tissue is a person. I will depend on God for that answer, not you.

6. The spotted owl was just a legal reason to save an entire habitat, which indeed was worth saving even if just for the benefit to humans. If you don't understand basic ecology, go learn something.

7. Nobody said condoms would make problems go away, but it sure beats nothing.

Your forgot some other myths I've fallen for - the earth is a globe that revolves around the sun, for instance.

By the way, if you can't even spell someone's name, you're too dumb to criticize them.

2007-07-16 06:31:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

1. - True. CFC's (chloroflorocarbons) chemically rip apart ozone moleclues, and then recycle themselves to countinue the cycle. I'm not going to give you the chemical equation because judging by your question, your not going to care anyway.

2. False. It isn't. The carbon dioxide concentration in our atmosphere is so high now (and continuing to increase) that there won't be another ice age until the human species goes extinct. At least that's one thing we don't have to worry about.

3. Not going to touch this one, other than there will always be poor. It's all perspective.

4. Drug companies are to blame. Doctors are to blame. Patients are to blame. Stop pointing fingers and start helping people. And the terrorist comment is just ignorant.

5. I'm anti-abortion. And anti-anti abortion activists. I'll let you ponder that one...

6. If you take their trees, they have to find a replacement somewhere. It's kinda how nature works...

7. There's no good answer.

Finally...politicians will always be politicians. It's their job.

2007-07-16 06:03:13 · answer #3 · answered by Cathy Helen 2 · 2 0

worldwide warming has no longer something to do with drilling for oil or gas costs. worldwide warming fans are encouraging for different sources of potential, so we wouldnt be paying $4 a gallon by fact we does not be wanting gas. certainly gas can no longer final continuously, although if we drill in alaska or no longer. what's SO incorrect with human beings finding for different sources consisting of photograph voltaic potential or wind or something? the faster we're not so based on gas, the extra constructive. it is not approximately having timber to hug, it is approximately no longer destroying each and every little bit of land we've. What approximately each and all the organic worldwide and animals that inhabit the land? Why could desire to they go through basically so we could have a short-term answer to an issue that's unlikely to bypass away.

2016-11-09 11:18:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Is this a question, and you talk as if America is the only country in the world. They got Global Warming in places that have never heard of Al Gore or Nancy ,how do you explain that??

i think you are the one falling
freefalling
you forgot the background music
dont confuse Global Warming with politics
they are seperate concepts
if the one mentions the other does not mean that they are married.

2007-07-16 19:22:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

what kind of a person are you! did you actually went to a lab and seen what the ozone looks like did you actually look at the ice caps no the world is not heading for another ice age can you feel the very hot weathers in places it wouldnt be hot huh
yes you cant kill an animals habitat think if animals killed our homes!

2007-07-16 06:12:50 · answer #6 · answered by PoO pOo HeAd 1 · 1 0

I live on the left coast, I know the difference between a fairy tale and a nightmare, and the teen birth rate has gone down substantially.

I have a large hammer that might knock that chip off your shoulder!

2007-07-16 07:17:17 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I cannot speak on many of these, but #2 is in fact correct assuming global warming is not averted. Your lack on research on this topic leads me to believe you should perhaps actually do some research on the other points in your list.

2007-07-16 05:51:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

why are you so angry at people trying to help our children have a future?? Whether or not it is a lie makes no differance. Is "left coast" or "right coast" that important? It has seemed to become the new racism type thing. no opinion here, except why are you angry?

2007-07-16 05:54:24 · answer #9 · answered by tickertock 3 · 2 0

Maybe you should try reading some scientific research sometime. Just a suggestion.

2007-07-16 05:47:40 · answer #10 · answered by Dana1981 7 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers