This follows on, kind of, from my previous question about the origins of the universe.
A widespread, and often valid, contradiction of religion is that its believers follow it without due consideration - for example, if we take Christianity, they will argue the Bible, and everything contained in it is right.
Whether or not this is true is irrelevant for just now - but people often say in response to this, i've realised on here "where is your proof?"
So it's all about proof, is it. Well, I have to ask about proof of scientific theories too. Ah, now hang on, I know the scientists have done the work. Give me a sec.
Someone replied to a question saying "99.9% of scientists believe in the Big Bang Theory". So it's easy to quote statistics.
But statistics are so easily manipulated. And you may tell me that "mathematical formulae" prove the universe was not created by God.
How many of us, in all honesty, myself included, actually understand the complex physics and maths
2007-07-16
05:14:40
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
involved in these theories? Not just, oh yeh, I know how evolution happens. But could explain to someone else the maths behind such and such a reaction oin the creation of the Earth?
So my question here is, is “proof” in the form of science – mathematics, physics, etc. any more of a “proof” for something than the Bible, if you can’t explain exactly how it happens? (And you may say you understand perfectly, so if you do, I’d like some “proof” of that before I am convinced as well.)
I’m not trying to insult people’s intelligence at all – all I am saying is, we cannot all be rocket scientists. If you do not fully understand the facts you talk about yet follow like a sheep anyway, is that really any better than someone who follows a religious text with no questioning of it?
(sorry that was a bit wrong…and again….this is NOT an attack…it’s just an alternate point of view thrown in there….)
2007-07-16
05:14:50 ·
update #1