Oh, c'mon. Only *some* Americans are doing their best -- some of 'em are anorexic whiners doing NOTHING about carbon drawdown.
Thank goodness for all those fat Europeans, Asians and Africans who are pitching in to help stop global warming! It's a world problem, and we are all doing our best! (Oh, and the Australians are pulling their weight too!)
2007-07-16 05:16:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Madame M 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
in factor of certainty that the international temperature of 2007 is statistically the comparable as 2006 besides as each year considering that 2001. Temperatures around the international are actually not increasing as they might desire to in accordance to the basic thought in the back of international warming – the greenhouse consequence. Carbon dioxide is obviously increasing interior the Earth’s environment. It’s a immediately line upward. it somewhat is at the instant approximately 390 factors according to million. Pre-commercial levels have been approximately 285 ppm. considering that 1960 whilst precise annual measurements became extra good it has extra desirable progressively from approximately 315 ppm. If the greenhouse consequence is working as we expect of then the Earth’s temperature will upward push with the aid of fact the CO2 levels strengthen. For the previous decade the international has not warmed. It’s an observational certainty. needless to say the international of the previous 30 years is warmer than the previous an extended time and there is plentiful data (interior the northern hemisphere a minimum of) that the international is responding to those extra desirable temperatures. however the data exhibits that international warming as such has ceased.
2017-01-21 05:25:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Doing so, one may think that eating more meat reduces CO2 production, but do you know that when energy is released into the atmosphere (large partial), the energy is actually heat energy? At this point, that is no help to the condition either. Only way is to cut down on meat consumption. Otherwise, take a look at "Green" countries like Costa Rica. Animal hunting, injuring or unnecessary killing is a serious crime and heavily punishable by law.
2007-07-16 05:40:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lacieles 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, your chemistry and biology are completely wrong, and your assumptions as well as your conclusions are laughably divorced from reality, but other than that, you're absolutely correct. See, it's a little-known secret, closely guarded by the secret Weight-Watchers Society (not the one everybody knows about) that fat people absorb more heat than thin people. This is why, in collaboration with the Illuminati and (of course) the Roman Catholic Church, they have worked for the past century or so to increase the proportion of fat people in the western world. The secret prophecies told them that it would be necessary (neccesary? neccessary? darn that word - it's just like banananana).
2007-07-16 06:31:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by John R 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
That makes no sense at all. People dont take CO2 out of the air... we produce it. Also, theyre sitting around being chubby and sweating and being hot so they crank up the A/C and use more electricity. Their cars have to work harder to pull their lard around and that produces more global warming. They eat more burgers... more cows = more cow flatulance = less ozone. And on and on.
2007-07-16 05:15:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by timssterling 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
No we make carbon dioxide. We need more fat trees.
2007-07-17 19:14:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Would Ronald M stand for Ronald McDonald? To answer your question, no, fat people are larger, requiring larger amounts of fabric for clothes, sometimes their heavness causes them to break what they sit on (my uncle broke a chair and a toilet), more fuel is required for their transportation, food is obvious!
2007-07-16 09:48:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by lucy 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
OMG- ur right, they use more oxygen and so they put more Co2 in the air therefore causing global warming. To bad global warming isn't real.
2007-07-16 05:09:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by sillygoose112393 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
Yeah but the more they eat the more methane they produce. 6 of one half a dozen of the other.
2007-07-16 05:08:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jason J 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
yes
2007-07-16 08:38:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Samantha 6
·
0⤊
0⤋