What difference would it make?
2007-07-15 18:38:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I own a truck a car two lawn tractors an atv a minibike and a boat, soon to have a dirtbike. So I need fuel and a boy-cot would suck. Why would I boy-cot only one chain of gas stations . They are all thief's anyway
2007-07-16 01:15:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Garfield 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If consumers want to decrease the cost of gasoline, then they would have to boy-cot the biggest one. Exxon Mobil is by far the powerhouse in this ...
2007-07-16 02:05:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by ken010101 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Citgo. Buying Citgo gas puts money in the pockets of Hugo Chavez, Venezuela's socialist dictator.
2007-07-16 00:38:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Scott H 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't boycott any of them. Why? Hypothetical situation: If every single American was to boycott Exxon-Mobil, then they would have a surplus, then they would do one of two things: 1) They would offer their surplus at face value (the cost of the oil, plus manufacturing, transport, and additives) which today would cost about $2.59 (today's price was $3.35/gal), but that would be extremly short term because of production margins. or 2) They would sell their surplus to whoever was willing to buy, therefore still making a profit.
So, overall, you could boycott a fuel company, but it wouldn't have any effect on fuel prices or how much that company makes.
2007-07-16 05:53:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Zach 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Citgo yes Exxon /mobil is a USA & Mexico gas maybe?
2007-07-16 12:03:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by 45 auto 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd boycott ExxonMobil because they profited the most in 2006.
2007-07-16 00:36:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Blue Jean Baby 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Mobil. its the largest one.
2007-07-16 00:38:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by kmm333 4
·
0⤊
0⤋