Can not evolution and creation be compatible if evolution does not violate the "like kind/after its kind rule?

Question

Evolution is defined in one definition as "The process of developing. Gradual development.

Answer 1

That's known as microevolution and is accepted by many creationist.
The main idea behind it is that the original kinds contained all DNA traits. Since mutations have been shown to be always the result of loss of information (never has been any evidence for added information) then the resulting offspring are of the same kind but of reduced characteristics.
Through isolation of populations and survival of the fittest these populations can actually devolve to the point of not being able to breed although they are still of the same kind.

Answer 2

Only if you are referring to "microevolution" which is the theory that natural selection can, over time, take an organism and transform it into a more specialized species of that organism.
"Macroevolution" on the other hand, is an unconfirmed HYPOTHESIS that processes similar to those at work in microevolution can, over eons of time, transform an organism into a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT KIND of organism.
It claims "molecules to man" evolution.
Microevolution does not flow into macroevolution.
There is a distinction.
According to His Word, God created all things in 6 days.
This occurred about 6000 years ago. This date was determined largely by the genealogies in the Bible. The Bible is a credible historical document and archeologically accurate. The worldwide flood explains many of the fossils.
It has been shown that fossils do not need millions of years to form. If you look at creation, you will see intelligent design, not a random act of things coming together. There is no such thing as a simple life form. Consider the complexities of a single cell. The evidence we have fits the Biblical account of creation. We have an eyewitness, God, who inspired Moses to write down His (God's word) in the book of Genesis.

Answer 3

No, y.a. is a few distance too immature/unprofessional to apply as any form of communicate board. there are distinctive boards on those matters, and that they are in basic terms a google seek away. yet to offer a short answer. God would not would desire to be disproved, no person has ever been able to coach God's existence, in basic terms as no person has ever been able to coach that unicorns exist. technology has proved evolution. technology has rejected creationism, and that they giggle at it, and rightly so. maximum creationists are uneducated fools who think of that, in basic terms because of the fact they'd have an opinion, they get to assert regardless of they want. Scientists are the knowledgeable ones, and that they have made those judgements. in case you want to disprove evolution, properly, get examining, or close up. technology isn't politics. no remember what proportion uneducated human beings think of that evolution is faulty would not exchange the certainty that the knowledgeable ones have desperate that it incredibly is suitable. in case you're too lazy to income the factor you want to disprove, properly, tricky success. Cry me a river. Edit, to author: particular i'm suggesting it incredibly is too immature. Why I stay right here? properly, I incredibly have my reasons. so which you think of YA is mature? Is that why often over 50% of all the solutions human beings ever get are immature or poeish?

Answer 4

Yes- when one understands that it is evolution of the soul not the bodies. We living entities (The souls) evolve through 8,400,000 species of life, once one comes to the human form of life they are given the intelligence to question their existence and relationship with God. (Also known as Krishna, Allah, Jehovah, etc.) Then they have a choice to make spiritual progress and transcend this material illusion (Maya) or degrade themselves and transgress back to animal species. This is Gods mercy upon the soul to take a lower body if their consciousness is so degraded because in the animal species one does not get karma for their actions but a human does. For info on this topic read Forbidden archeology and The Hidden History of the Human Race. By Michael A. Cremo do a google. Also read Bhagavad Gita as it is BY BHaktivedanta Prabhupada tells all about this. asitis.com you can read on line. One has to understand Karma, reincarnation and no one goes to hell eternally to understand the unlimited mercy and love of God.

Answer 5

There are over 200,000 peer-reviewed scientific papers on evolution. There are no peer-reviewed scientific papers on creationism... none. Creationism is based on belief and religion, evolution is based on evidence - and a lot of it. Those who say that there is no evidence for evolution are either lying or deny the existence of the evidence because it doesn't fit in with what they believe, which is another form of lying, IMHO. No, they are not compatible.

Answer 6

It's imposible that the two words be compatible. evolution-the process of developing, but creation is more than magic . The power let something appeared out of nothing.

Answer 7

Of course they can, and DO...only the lunatic fringe Fundamentalist believe in creationism only. Other Christian faiths accept that creation is an ongoing thing, and the "day" of the bible cannot be taken literally, but means millions of years. All we hear about is the nut cases who claim the Earth is but 6000 years old. No sane religion regards the bible as a literal piece of work. It is filled with metaphors so that relatively simple people could understand it. People of a couple of thousand years ago had no concept of millions/billions of years. But they did understand "Day."

Answer 8

I believe that God created the world through evolution. I mean who's to say that that's not exactly what he did. God created all things and therefore he created science so it makes sense that he would do things scientifically. Science compliments religion.

Answer 9

of course, it is always a micro scale like a tiny birds beak becoming slightly longer to adapt to a changing food source, besides even slight changes over time are allowed by god anyways, it is his creation. macro evolution man from monkeys is just plain crazy.

Answer 10

No... for me, they are not compatible because creation still requires a creator and I don't believe there IS a creator. There is proof of evolution... no proof of god.