English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

INTRODUCTION
"You know you never defeated us on the
battlefield," said the American colonel.
The North Vietnamese colonel pondered
this remark a moment. "That may be so,"
he replied, "but it is also irrelavent."
Conversation in Hanoi, April 19751
This project began with the question, "How could a
country win all the battles, and yet still lose the war?"
How could a country which is as rich and powerful as our
own, superior in every measurable category of military
strength, emerge as the loser with one of the world's
smallest and poorest countries? Why are our greatest
victories remembered as defeats? Why would a Congress that
approved the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution in 1964 with only two
dissenting votes turn its back on its South Vietnamese ally
when the North Vietnamese launched a full-scale conventional
invasion only eight years later?
In seeking answers to these questions it became readily
apparent that the American defense of South Vietnam was
brought to its unhappy conclusion not by a failure of
American arms, but rather by a failure of American will.
Former President Nixon said it this way:
The War in Vietnam was not lost on the
battlefields of Vietnam. It was lost
in the halls of Congress ... in the
editorial rooms of great newspapers ...
and in the classrooms of great
universities.2

2007-07-15 10:16:02 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

8 answers

Absolute Crud
I'm a Vietnam Vet twice over, It wasn't lost by the Congress or the Army, it was lost the same way we will loose Iraq. The Government the French installed in the South had no support among it's own people. It was a bunch of rich people from Hanoi who were brought there after the cease fire.

We set up a system where the Minorities secured the mountains and outlying areas. Many of these minorities, Khmer, Nung, Hmong, Meo hated all Vietnamese and were paid by us. Within two years of our leaving they and the ARVN had a falling out and when the Communist came they just got out of the way.

Besides, are we friends with Vietnam now?

If we hand Muqtada al Sadr the keys and leave he will destroy al Quida in Iraq and perhaps in 20 years we can be friends

2007-07-15 10:35:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Couldn't agree more. Seven times, President Johnson refused to allow execution of Operation Tiger Claw. It would have cut off all lines of communication between Hanoi and the south, at a cost of about 2,000 dead and wounded. Following the seventh veto, every ranking general of Marines and Navy admiral retired within thirty days of each other in mid-1967. After President Ford came to the Oval Office as a totally unelected President, the Congress "rolled" him and cut off all funding to South Vietnam in the Autumn of 1974. On April 25, 1975 the nation of South Vietnam ceased to exist. So much for "exit strategies".

2007-07-15 10:27:47 · answer #2 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 2 0

the U. S. did not lose the Vietnam conflict. What got here approximately is what we British call a tactical withdrawal. In any democracy4207e7bb62b9b5d14bdb63f74e683c except the folk help their protection rigidity forces4207e7bb62b9b5d14bdb63f74e683c there comes a component while it somewhat is better to withdrawn and pass domicile and regoup and so on. Such became the case with the Vietnam conflict. right here in united kingdom we weren't in contact in the Vietnam conflict in any way immediately. However4207e7bb62b9b5d14bdb63f74e683c it became obtrusive even to us die-hards4207e7bb62b9b5d14bdb63f74e683c that adequate is adequate and so on. look at it from this historic stand component. while Lord Cornwallis surrendered his sword to primary George Washington united states of america at Yorktown4207e7bb62b9b5d14bdb63f74e683c there have been nonetheless 10000 [4207e7bb62b9b5d14bdb63f74e683c4207e7bb62b9b5d14bdb63f74e683c4207e7bb62b9b5d14bdb63f74e683c4207e7bb62b9b5d14bdb63f74e683c4207e7bb62b9b5d14bdb63f74e683c4207e7bb62b9b5d14bdb63f74e683c] British Lobsters in the unswerving city of manhattan. The British military then in a head on with the rag-tag mob of the Continental military would have purely ran for the duration of the lot of them and directly to anyplace with none subject what so ever. yet it somewhat isn't the way of it. enable's get out and save a minimum of a semblance of an excellent image. My suggestion is for the individuals to wipe it from their minds and circulate on.

2016-09-30 01:38:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You answered your own Question We our Military have never lost a War! Congress Lost a War of politics and embarrassed The goverment and our nation by poor choices
BUT The rest of the world only remembers that we the Soldiers Lost to Vietnam We did not. We lost to our country and our congress!

2007-07-15 10:26:32 · answer #4 · answered by ASmiles1 4 · 2 1

It seems to me that President Nixon already gave you the answer. It is happening again with the current war against Islamic Fascism. Liberals are using the same playbook to bring about another American defeat. What they don't realize is that this enemy wants to rule the world and you either convert or die.

2007-07-15 10:25:16 · answer #5 · answered by drgnrdr451 5 · 2 1

Very true, as failure is right around the corner in Iraq, don't blame George Bush, blame the American people for not supporting the effort, it's that plain and simple.

2007-07-15 10:45:01 · answer #6 · answered by The Scorpion 6 · 2 0

Thank you for your service to our country. We have not lost all our greatness, despite the challenges we face in today's society. Your service was not in vain.

2007-07-15 10:28:11 · answer #7 · answered by Crystal 4 · 1 1

nixon...lol...a true american who quit his job to avoid jail...

2007-07-15 10:23:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers