Anyone got any positive evidence for Creationism?

Question

Question was unfairly DELETED whilst good answers were being presented.

IF YAHOO ALLOWS, LET THE GAMES BEGIN ANEW.

Please resubmit your answers !!!

>>>>>>><<<<<<<

My reply to deleted question was >>>

"Women

Such advanced curvature could NEVER be an accident or result of EVILUTION.

dave
Source(s):

Read the entire Bible.

Believe it. "

>>>>>>><<<<<<<

>>>>>>><<<<<<<

"You wouldn't believe me if I told you.But I will try to answer,if you answer me these questions.Feel free to e-mail me back.The rule of physics is that matter can't be destroyed.It only changes.Here is question one.Where did the original matter come from in the Big Bang?It had to come from somewhere.
Second question.Science says,then all that matter formed plants.Which happened to form atmosphere.Which happened to form form water.then chemicals happened to form single cell organism...etc.Here is the question.What is the probability of that happening?Without absolute fact.It would be considered faith.Which is a religion.Feel free to answer."

reply >>>

This is a request for your data . Whether I personally believe you is not necessary. Please present the data for all to examine.

>>>>>>><<<<<<<

"Where did the original matter come from in the Big Bang?"

answer >>> Your assumption that "matter cannot be created or destroyed" is a FALLACY. GOD IS ABLE TO BOTH CREATE AND DESTROY MATTER JUST BY HIS WILL.

You either believe that GOD created purely by HIS WILL, or you do not. IT IS CALLED FAITH IN THE ALMIGHTY JEHOVAH GOD, HOLY SPIRIT YAHWEH,
JESUS CHRIST THE LORD.

WITH GOD ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE >>> EVEN THE CREATION FROM NOTHING AND THE TOTAL DESTRUCTION OF MATTER.

GOD IS THE CREATOR. Not only is HE not bound by HIS own created laws, HE is able to change the standing laws at every level of creation. At every dimensional level, every separate time domain, every different location in whatever location HE chooses, AND AT ANY TIME HE CHOOSES IN ANY WAY HE CHOOSES.

>>>>>>><<<<<<<

"Second question.Science says,then all that matter formed plants.Which happened to form atmosphere.Which happened to form form water.then chemicals happened to form single cell organism...etc.Here is the question.What is the probability of that happening?"

reply >>>>

Since GOD said it THAT SETTLES IT. If there is absolute proof >>> THEN WHY THE NEED FOR FAITH ???????

John 3:16-17 (New King James Version)

16 For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life. 17 For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.

Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

Without FAITH it is impossible to please HIM.

JESUS Bless you,

dave

>>>>>>><<<<<<<

>>>>>>><<<<<<<

11:21 PM Sunday 15 JUL 07

I have still not received some repost to the original question.

>>>>>>><<<<<<<

Answer 1

DNA Double Helix: A Recent Discovery of Enormous Complexity
The DNA Double Helix is one of the greatest scientific discoveries of all time. First described by James Watson and Francis Crick in 1953, DNA is the famous molecule of genetics that establishes each organism's physical characteristics. It wasn't until mid-2001, that the Human Genome Project and Celera Genomics jointly presented the true nature and complexity of the digital code inherent in DNA. We now understand that each human DNA molecule is comprised of chemical bases arranged in approximately 3 billion precise sequences. Even the DNA molecule for the single-celled bacterium, E. coli, contains enough information to fill all the books in any of the world's largest libraries.

DNA Double Helix: The "Basics"
DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) is a double-stranded molecule that is twisted into a helix like a spiral staircase. Each strand is comprised of a sugar-phosphate backbone and numerous base chemicals attached in pairs. The four bases that make up the stairs in the spiraling staircase are adenine (A), thymine (T), cytosine (C) and guanine (G). These stairs act as the "letters" in the genetic alphabet, combining into complex sequences to form the words, sentences and paragraphs that act as instructions to guide the formation and functioning of the host cell. Maybe even more appropriately, the A, T, C and G in the genetic code of the DNA molecule can be compared to the "0" and "1" in the binary code of computer software. Like software to a computer, the DNA code is a genetic language that communicates information to the organic cell.

The DNA code, like a floppy disk of binary code, is quite simple in its basic paired structure. However, it's the sequencing and functioning of that code that's enormously complex. Through recent technologies like x-ray crystallography, we now know that the cell is not a "blob of protoplasm", but rather a microscopic marvel that is more complex than the space shuttle. The cell is very complicated, using vast numbers of phenomenally precise DNA instructions to control its every function.

Although DNA code is remarkably complex, it's the information translation system connected to that code that really baffles science. Like any language, letters and words mean nothing outside the language convention used to give those letters and words meaning. This is modern information theory at its core. A simple binary example of information theory is the "Midnight Ride of Paul Revere." In that famous story, Mr. Revere asks a friend to put one light in the window of the North Church if the British came by land, and two lights if they came by sea. Without a shared language convention between Paul Revere and his friend, that simple communication effort would mean nothing. Well, take that simple example and multiply by a factor containing many zeros.

We now know that the DNA molecule is an intricate message system. To claim that DNA arose by random material forces is to say that information can arise by random material forces. Many scientists argue that the chemical building blocks of the DNA molecule can be explained by natural evolutionary processes. However, they must realize that the material base of a message is completely independent of the information transmitted. Thus, the chemical building blocks have nothing to do with the origin of the complex message. As a simple illustration, the information content of the clause "nature was designed" has nothing to do with the writing material used, whether ink, paint, chalk or crayon. In fact, the clause can be written in binary code, Morse code or smoke signals, but the message remains the same, independent of the medium. There is obviously no relationship between the information and the material base used to transmit it. Some current theories argue that self-organizing properties within the base chemicals themselves created the information in the first DNA molecule. Others argue that external self-organizing forces created the first DNA molecule. However, all of these theories must hold to the illogical conclusion that the material used to transmit the information also produced the information itself. Contrary to the current theories of evolutionary scientists, the information contained within the genetic code must be entirely independent of the chemical makeup of the DNA molecule.

DNA Double Helix: Its Existence Alone Defeats any Theory of Evolution
The scientific reality of the DNA double helix can single-handedly defeat any theory that assumes life arose from non-life through materialistic forces. Evolution theory has convinced many people that the design in our world is merely "apparent" -- just the result of random, natural processes. However, with the discovery, mapping and sequencing of the DNA molecule, we now understand that organic life is based on vastly complex information code, and such information cannot be created or interpreted without a Master Designer at the cosmic keyboard.

Learn More Now! http://www.allaboutthejourney.org/theory-of-evolution.htm

Answer 2

The first two laws of Thermodynamics pretty much says it all and you can't get around that.

The law of entropy says that all matter disintegrates. From the moment you're born, you are dying and your body is breaking down. So is the new house you just built, the car you just bought and the new puppy in your yard. In short, if all matter DIDN'T disintegrate, you wouldn't see cars in junk yards and houses being torn down because they're too old to stand.

Yes, I've been to places that have 2500 year old structures, and the reason they're still standing is because every once in a while, the government has to come and shore it up to help it continue to be a tourist spot.

Here's a video for you to watch that actually talks about things just like this. It's very interesting and it's about 20 minutes long. It's done by some pretty hefty scientists and it really makes you stop and think.

http://www.christiananswers.net/creation...

If you're going to argue evolution from a scientific standpoint, you should at least know what the scientists on the other side of the aisle have to say.

PS: There's also the DNA code. If it's a code, WHO WROTE THE CODE??

Answer 3

You wouldn't believe me if I told you.But I will try to answer,if you answer me these questions.Feel free to e-mail me back.The rule of physics is that matter can't be destroyed.It only changes.Here is question one.Where did the original matter come from in the Big Bang?It had to come from somewhere.
Second question.Science says,then all that matter formed plants.Which happened to form atmosphere.Which happened to form form water.then chemicals happened to form single cell organism...etc.Here is the question.What is the probability of that happening?Without absolute fact.It would be considered faith.Which is a religion.Feel free to answer.

Answer 4

Thank you. I was just about to answer that one. I can think of two.
1. The sudden development of writing.
2. The improbable probability of the evolution of sexual reproduction.

1. The sudden development of writing
Given the evolutionary hypothesis, any healthy normal growing boy can describe in convincing detail how long ago “the naive child of nature” 32 everywhere drew crude pictures to convey his simple thoughts, and how out of this the process moved “everywhere inexorably … towards the final stage, the alphabetic writing.” 33 To save our eager high-school student from undue embarrassment, we have just quoted two eminent scholars. But if it really happened that way, then we would find traces of evolving writing “everywhere”; veritable middens of scratched rock and bones and shells would attest the universal groping toward the inexorable final stage over tens of thousands of years, while the clumsy transitional forms should outnumber proper writing by at least a million to one. Only the vast accumulations of attempts at writing simply do not exist; there is no evidence whatever of a worldwide groping toward the goal.

Having made his lucid and logical statement, the author of our last quotation observes with perplexity that “it is surprising that the ultimate stage in evolution … was only achieved in a very few spots on the globe.” 34 That is, we do not find a multiplicity of writing systems throughout the world; in fact, when we come right down to it, there seems to have been only one! We find “only a very few systems of writing,” says David, “… and even these are so much alike and so closely related in time and space that their independence appears at least problematical.” 35 The vast worldwide corpus of embryonic scribblings that should attest the long ages of slow transition from picture-writing to true writing simply is not there, and the innumerable systems of writing that must have resulted from the basic psychological need of men everywhere to express themselves can be counted on the fingers, and most probably on the thumbs, of one hand.

2.The improbable probability of the evolution of sexual reproduction.
According to evolutionary theories, living things continued to reproduce as they became ever more complex. At some stage, though, the female of a number of species had to develop reproductive cells requiring fertilization by a male with complementary reproductive cells. In order to supply the proper number of chromosomes to the offspring, each parent's reproductive cells undergo a remarkable process called meiosis, whereby cells from each parent are left with half the usual number of chromosomes. This process prevents the offspring from having too many chromosomes.

Of course, the same process would have been needed for other species. How, then, did the "first mother" of each species become capable of reproducing with a fully developed "first father"? How could both of them have suddenly been able to halve the number of chromosomes in their reproductive cells in the manner needed to produce a healthy offspring with some characteristics of both parents? And if these reproductive features developed gradually, how would the male and female of each species have survived while such vital features were still only partially formed?

In even a single species, the odds against this reproductive interdependence coming about by chance are beyond measuring. The chance that it arose in one species after another defies reasonable explanation. Can a theoretical process of evolution explain such complexity? How could accidental, random, purposeless events result in such intricately interrelated systems?
and....
http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/138

Answer 5

Read it. Came to believe. I am not Thomas, so I feel blessed. Let the games begin, starting with the thumbs down. Nice connection to the "thumbs down" that preceded the death of the Christian martyrs. I know my Eternal Address, in spite of a misquided man saying I will go to hell. I will pray for him, and all those lead astray by false teachers.

Answer 6

proof of creationism is everywhere. common sense alone should tell us that none of this was accidental. even science says that life reproduces after its kind. the distance our planet is from the sun-perfect. the amount of oxygen and other gasses in the atmosphere-perfect. would evolution have come up with the panda or the koala,each of which eats only one kind of food?(terribly inefficient,evolution-wise). even if you go with the big bang theory,where did the stuff come from that went bang?

Answer 7

i suppose that people speaking so many different languages is a product of evolution... what was that story in the bible? didn't god make people speak in different tounges.... shureley if god did that, then he created us.... i mean how would people come up with so many different ways of communication, yet some are similar?

Answer 8

Creationism doesn't depend on evidence -- it depends on gullible people willing to believe that everything was "designed" by a creator, just because it says so in the bible.

Kirk Cameron and his intelligently-designed banana would tend to cancel all that out, because he can't explain kiwi fruit or pineapples.

Answer 9

wake me when somebody comes up with something that does not resolve to argument from complexity, ignorance or personal incredulity or irreducible complexity misunderstandings.

Answer 10

to me the brain is proof something was created