English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is it more ludicrous believing that a God in the sky actually exists or that an all knowing and powerful God needs to save his greatest creations from damnation by coming as a human and dying on a cross?

2007-07-15 06:21:03 · 21 answers · asked by beatme 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

21 answers

The latter, because it includes the former.

http://www.newfoundations.com/EGR/Reasonable1.html#Femin

2007-07-15 06:26:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

What is so unbelieveable about the belief that a cosmic Jewish zombie, who is his own father, can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and telepathically tell him that you accept him as your master so he can remove an evil force from your soul that is present in humanity because a rib-woman was convinced to eat from a magical tree by an infinitely sadistic being, disguised as a talking snake with legs...?

2007-07-15 13:29:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

The second - as it presumes the first - is a narrower set of circumstances, and is therefore more difficult to believe.

Many more people agree on the first - God exists - than the second - Jesus was the Messiah - so science confirms my deductive analysis

2007-07-15 13:27:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

It seems unbelievable to me that you God haters still feel you need to justify your non belief in God. If you don't want to believe than don't. Why make a specticle of it.

2007-07-15 13:29:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Believing that consciousness, intelligence, free will, and our senses of morality and beauty came from matter that does not have any of them rather than being received from a being that does have all of them.

2007-07-15 13:29:34 · answer #5 · answered by Deof Movestofca 7 · 0 1

Believing that this creation is 'pure chance' is much more unbelievable. BTW God is in heaven, which is not in the sky, just ask NASA.

2007-07-15 13:25:18 · answer #6 · answered by great gig in the sky 7 · 5 4

Both are equally unbelievable........Its more probable that aliens interfered with human evolution.

2007-07-15 13:27:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

That was a story a great religion is built upon. Jesus Christ was no more than a messenger of God.

2007-07-15 13:27:05 · answer #8 · answered by Ismail Eliat 6 · 0 3

God didn't come as a human, he gave his only begotten son Jesus to do that. Neither one of thoes are unbelievable, just read the bible and go to church and you will believe, trust me.

2007-07-15 13:30:29 · answer #9 · answered by jla 2 · 0 4

Little from column A, little from column B

2007-07-15 13:24:10 · answer #10 · answered by Vandal 2 · 1 2

well when u put it like that it all sounds pretty frigging ridiculous

2007-07-15 13:31:21 · answer #11 · answered by Still*Perfect 4 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers