Do you believe a man called Jesus was crucified on a cross around 2000 years ago but was not the son of God and God himself?
2007-07-15 06:07:06 · 25 answers · asked by beatme 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Jesus did and does exist. He is God and sits on the throne in heaven. Yes He did get crucified on the cross about 2000 years ago. He died for you and me and anyone who will accept His death as "atonement" for their sins.
2007-07-15 06:13:00 · answer #1 · answered by Stratobratster 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sure. And that's all he was. A MAN..the humble son of a carpenter,and a great spiritual seeker. Smart, like his mother, who lied to save her life, because she didn't want to get stoned to death in the town square; the penalty for pregnancy out-of-wedlock at the time. Thanks, Mary for being so smart. Like mother, like son.
If the trinity were the real deal, Jesus wouldn't have sweat blood in the Garden of Gethsemane. He wanted out of that deal. and the most confusing part of that story..is that if Peter, John, and James all fell asleep as Jesus prayed alone,WHO WAS THERE TO WITNESS THE EVENT AND WRITE ALL THESE FACTS DOWN?
Men scribed the bible....pretty good story, considering no witnesses.
Jesus never wanted all this attention. Life of Brian has more accuracy than you might think on first look. Like Adam & Eve and The Virgin Mary, Jesus was set up.
2007-07-15 06:31:29 · answer #2 · answered by Monsieur Recital Vinyliste 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I think so and believe Jesus was a great teacher but do not believe in the immaculate conception. Mary had to be a virgin or Joseph would not have married her also believe an old sheep Herder came in under the tent late one night to see her. She had to tell Joseph the unbelievable story about God miraculous inception of her.
2007-07-15 06:21:43 · answer #3 · answered by lonetraveler 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, i believe that a man named Jesus lived and died on the cross 2000 years ago but i believe Him to be the son of GOD. sorry if you don't like that
2007-07-15 06:10:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
probably, yet then I additionally suspect King Arthur replaced into in accordance with a real guy or woman. King Arthur and Jesus have plenty in elementary. See there probably replaced right into a frontrunner in Britain who had some victories over Saxon invaders, perchance dissimilar adult adult males who had such victories. and that all of them had memories approximately them that unfold, getting extra complex with each and each retelling (as memories are wont to do). Then, properly after the guy(s) have been ineffective and the human beings who knew them have been ineffective somebody else theory those memories would make a great great tale OF THE u . s . a .! And wrote down a collection of the memories and threw in some dramatic artsy bits for good degree, like a wizard, wizards are cool, and a magic sword, and a woman in a lake, and a eco-friendly knight, and THE HOLY GRAIL, because of the fact chicks dig holy grails. Likewise there have been probably some adult adult males, or guy, wandering around Rome occupied Judea inflicting hassle (which happens in distant places-occupied lands, bypass discern!), with some followers and stuff and then years after he (they?) have been ineffective..... and so on in the comparable trend, yet with wine and walking on the water, and being immortal (oh wait, King Arthur is meant to come back back back whilst his u . s . a . desires him o.O) tl;dr version: A actual guy or woman would have existed with out that guy or woman being divine or having executed all the failings credited to them. additionally "different non-non secular human beings". Muslims are non secular. Your religiocentrism is showing.
2016-10-21 09:16:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do believe that there was a historical man named Jesus who tried to teach spiritual lessons. I believe he was the son of God and God himself in the sense that we all are "children" of the Divine (by whatever name you use), and that the Divine is in all of us.
2007-07-15 11:01:43 · answer #6 · answered by s1sm00n 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd follow Jesus whether he was just a man or if he was the son of God.
2007-07-15 06:19:32 · answer #7 · answered by Concept Styles 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I do believe there was a man named jesus, but not a god. I do believe this also, that he practised witchcraft to perform his healings and such. Now as far as he being crucified, maybe true, but only for his belief in witchcraft.
2007-07-15 06:17:57 · answer #8 · answered by Annieaa 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's possible there was a mortal man with the name of Jesus, which was a very common name at the time, who was executed by Roman authorities. Most myths have some small basis in fact.
2007-07-15 06:17:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I believe in Jesus the Messiah (100% God and 100% man)
2007-07-15 06:10:18 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋