What are your views on a New World Order?

Question

Who will it involve and how will it be acheived.Does it worry you.It worries me.

Answer 1

.The NWO order goes back to the time at least of the foundation the Illuminati and the French Revolution -which it was behind.
GH Bush use the actual phrase in a speech on the 9/11/91 -what a 'coincidence'
. The Bushes of course are a Illuminati family - Prescott Bush (also a Bonesman) aided and gained from the The Third Reich.

The last two presidential candidates Bush AND Kerrey were BOTH Bonesmen. Yet another BIG 'coincidence'.

The NWO -like the Illuminati is a Luciferian Cult.

It controls the UN which was bought and paid by Rockefeller,
as a New Age Guru David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations closely connected with the NWO stated:

"No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation."

According to ex MI6 Official DR John Coleman there is a conspiracy involving what is called the "Committee of 300".
One of their main goal(apart form their own domination) is global culling of billions of humanity.
It suits them to invent a "war on terror" for that reason.

This is connected to The UN's sustainable development program. again by Occultist figures like Canadian Maurice Strong and crypto-occultists like Prince Charles and Al Gore.

It has, since the Rio Earth Summit, hijacked and now is deeply involved in the Green and environmental movements.

For those who want to know where they meet -check out the Bilderberg Group conference-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Byed3cIWgZQ&mode=related&search=

also the higher degrees of Freemasonry, the Tri-Lateral Commission, Chatham House - formally known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs, The Round Table, The Council for Foreign Relations, the Club of Rome all of these have various off shoots all part of the NWO.
public awareness is their worst enemy and the net is causing them problems they haven't forseen- however nobody should underestimate their determination to plunge the world into World War, mass murder, famines and pandemics- and their global tyranny.


.most of those who deny their existence are mostly just their useful idiots - but some are also part of it

another point worth making is that Dr Coleman pointed out in the early 90s that FEMA is part of the NWO :

"To keep people everywhere from deciding their own destinies by means of one created crisis after another and then "managing" such crises.

This will confuse and demoralize the population to the extent where faced with too many choices, apathy on a massive scale will result. In the case of the US, an agency for Crisis Management is already in place. It is called the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), whose existence I first enclosed in 1980."

it throws new suspicion on why the aftermath of Katrina was handled so badly -when ordinary civilian volunteers were turned away by officials and other volunteers were delayed by red tape.

As with 9/11, incompetence and coincidence excuses can only reasonable stretch so far.

Answer 2

I am concerned about a one world order organized under the UN with a world court and other entities that undermine US soveriegnty. What do you think the global warming scare is all about? Submitting nations to the will of a central governmental authority. Some republicans are heading for the same result by taking a different road. True conservatives are the only ones fighting the development of a new/one world order

Answer 3

There definitely exists people, organizations and conglomerates who benefit from globalization and who advance its creation in every way possible. One only needs to look at the United Nations, NATO, various trade agreements and most obviously the European Union, which already has a common currency, flag and parliament. Look at how the west has lost control of our borders, too.

Globally nations are also becoming closer and less distinct due to the internet and global media. MTV is not just limited to North America, but has pervaded the whole of western Europe and much of the east, too - spawning the "MTV generation". If you go to Moscow you´ll find a McDonalds, Shanghai a Starbucks and Disney and Hollywood are just about ubiquitous - save for perhaps much of Africa and the Middle East.

Some of this is politically motivated (eg. Project for a New American Century), much of it is motivated by business seeking to tap into new markets. In my opinion there is certainly the potential for a "One World State" - though there are obstacles such as Islam, that first need to be overcome.

H.G. Wells said in his 1940 book entitled "The New World Order": "... when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people ... will hate the new world order ... and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people."

As you can see, the concept has been around for some time, and H.G. Well´s view is that it is not a nefarious project, but one that will bring universal peace and harmony and which will allow mankind to concentrate his efforts and utilise global resources for our benefit rather than on weapons to destroy one another.

I believe there are forums such as Bilderberg, where the aforementioned parties meet and plan or discuss how they will succeed in their ojectives...

Answer 4

i think of that's a confluence of single~difficulty paranoia, undesirable education, undesirable serious thinking, organic human concern, rumors, lies, and a % for some thing exciting and defining in in any different case mundane lives. such as you, i'm an agnostic, and once I project each and every of the N.W.O. advice to serious inquiry, it does not upward thrust up okay in any respect. area of the project is that the "New worldwide Order" term isn't a nicely~defined one. The word became used fairly in a speech given by making use of former President George H.W. Bush after the fall down of the Soviet Union as purely a thank you to describe the hot stability of skill and the hot geopolitical scheme, fairly than some deep~rooted controversy. In that sense, i think there's a continuously evolving "worldwide order" in that the geopolitical equipment is continuously shifting and changing and evolving, etc a on a regular basis foundation there's a "new worldwide order". regardless of the undeniable fact that, in the sense of a deeply furtive, not nicely~defined, conspiratorial company, I have not any reason to have confidence in a "New worldwide Order".

Answer 5

No it doesn't worry me. I think governments are too self-interested to form a New World Order; any kind of alliance will eventually either implode or be riven with factionalism between the bigger world powers like the UN, which frequently falls prey to it's East/West split.

But it does worry me that some people - on this site at least - writing in response to political questions feel disenfranchised and that just means that there may be a gap between what people think and feel and what the policies of the day are. In the past that has been one of the factors leading to forms of extreme government and that I think is a bigger worry for me.

Answer 6

Don't get me started, I have oddles of info on the subject and it's frightening. There's not enough room or time to go through it but believe me it's a fact. I will say this though, in 1913 America was a free country, then a band of powerful international bankers achieved their fathers and great grandfathers goal, and America has never been the same again.

Answer 7

When I first heard this expression, I think from Ronnie Regan, I assumed he was talking about the Nazis, as in the One Thousand Year Reich etc.

The New World Order = a world dominated by, etc.

Answer 8

I think that the NWO is moving right along with achieving the purposes for which it is designed. Fight back, learn the difference between authority(color of law) and law enforcement. Now, what does the Constitution mean? Who is in charge of your destiny?
You know as well as I, public discussions of NWO tactics and personnel will be grounds for investigation and further means of quashing dissent. Be very afraid.
Yet, seek and speak truth!

Answer 9

i think it is more like the new world disorder - as long as america supplies bombs- guns and tanks to gangs around the world - people will fight each other instead of the leaders of the new world order.

so i guess what scares me is that people are so dumb they fall for it. thugs can't recruit punks unless their are punks to recruit.

so like any day now i am waiting for the world to say ENOUGH - and put an end to Gestapo thinking thoughts and actions - like any day - but like just in case they don't i will still walk by the river and in the woods and find pleasure in things that are.

Answer 10

We aren't in it just yet but I hope I'm not around when it happens. I'm sure I will be tho! It is something that we want to avoid at all costs but a definitive sign of end times. The antichrist will come out of it.