This teaching is a combination of two separate concepts in the Old Testament: "the Law of First Things" and the "Law of the Tithe"
The resulting hybrid law has been brought over into the New Covenant and applied to the Church. Beside violating the New, this hybrid is also a faulty interpretation of the old !
2007-07-15
02:14:37
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
The "Law of First Things" is a reference to the commandments about the firstborn of man and animal and the firstfruits of fields, vineyards, and oliveyards. It is a separate concept from tithing and was regulated by separate commandments. God had no tolerance for changes in the Law. He designed each aspect to teach a spiritual lesson.
The Law said in Exoodus 13:2 -
"Sanctify unto me all the firstborn, whatsoever openeth the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and of beast: it is mine"
That was a one-time event for an individual animal. The tithe was an annual event from the herd as a whole. The two concepts couldn't be combined. There were two separate laws for two separate purposes and spiritual lessons.
Another unscriptural statement that has become popular is, " It it's not first, it's not a tithe." That means if you spend anything before you pay tithe then you have violated God's law and there will be no blessing. But the farmers in Israel couldn't know what..
2007-07-15
02:33:18 ·
update #1
..what their tithe would be until the entire harvest was finsihed. After that there was still a period of time before it could be delivered to the storehouse. In the meantime there was no law against selling or using portion that belonged to them. God didn't burden them with excessive legalism.
The Bible also contradicts that teaching in another way. According to the Law; when taking a tithe of flocks and herds, the tenth one that passed under the rod was the one given to the Lord, not the first one - Lev. 27:32-33 say,
"And concerning the tithe of the herd, or of the flock, even of whatsoever passeth under the rod, the tenth shall be holy unto the LORD.
He shall not search whether it be good or bad, neither shall he change it: and if he change it at all, then both it and the changed thereof shall be holy; it shall not be redeemed"
The word "tenth" in Lev 27:32 is an ordinal number, meaning the tenth one in a sequence. It does not mean a tithe or 10 %. It comes from a ...
2007-07-15
02:40:07 ·
update #2
..a different Hebrew word. That means the tenth animal belonged to the Lord, not the first one.
Israel was also instructed not to inspect the tenth animal to see if it was good or bad. It didn't matter if it was a bad one; that is the one they were commanded to give and they were not to replace it with a good one. That is another example of the Law being different that what we have been taught about it.
It must be said repeatedly, the key to the question of tithing is getting a revelation of New Covenant life in christ. Without a revelation of that, people get bogged down in controversy over isolated scriptures and miss the real issue.
Sincere people are trying to fit New Covenant living into a framework of Old Testament types and shadows. Jesus give Paul the apostle a revelation of spiritual reality in the New Covenant. All types and shadows need to be interpreted in the light of that.
Bringing the law of tithing over into the New Covenant is wrong in itself.
Creating a new ...
2007-07-15
02:47:35 ·
update #3
..hybrid law, out of tithing and firstfruits, and adding it on top of tithing is the same as what the Pharisees did.
The Law wasn't extensive enough for them. They had another body of law that they had created and added to God's law. In their minds they were sincere but they missed the point.
People don't think that the doctrine of tithing is a message of righteousness by works. But if all of God's redemption, protection and blessing depend on tithing, then what good is the righteousness we have been given as a free gift ?
They don't mean to say it but the righteousness they leave us with isn't good for anything by itself. So it isn't righteousness at all.
If failure to tithe makes me a God-robber, then my righteousness depends on tithing.
If failure to write out the first check on payday to the local church causes me to lose favor of God on my life, then my righteousness must depend on doint that.
If tithing is what redeems the remaining 90% of my paycheck, then the blood...
2007-07-15
02:55:26 ·
update #4
..of Jesus did not redeem it.
If a curse is going tocome upon me for not tithing, then Chrsit has not redeemed me from the curse of the Law.
The popular teaching on tithing is really saying that we need CHRIST PLUS TITHING ! It is saying that the Blood of Jesus wasn't enough, that we need the blood plus tithng !
The message of GRACE and the message of Tithing are as different as night and DAY !
Still more misinformation to come...
2007-07-15
02:58:38 ·
update #5