No. Even if the country is falling apart when he leaves office, the country was also falling apart when Buchanan left office and Buchanan only required one term to mess up so badly we needed a Lincoln (with a little help from Grant, Sherman and hundreds of thousands of brave Americans who died) to put us back together again. I just hope we get another Lincoln.
2007-07-14 20:35:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by anotherguy 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Worste Presidents Ever: James Buchanan (regulations brought about the South to chop loose from the union, for this reason commencing the U. S. Civil conflict) Jimmy Carter (13% inflation expenditures, skill disaster, hostages in Iran, 17 million unemployed human beings, American satisfaction at an all time low) bill Clinton (replaced into too busy attempting to hunt down and catch bill Gates than he replaced into with looking down and taking photos Bin weighted down) George Bush won't be the brightest or the best, and he won't even provide good speeches. yet Bush would have the excellence of having the utmost approval score of ANY president in the history of our u . s . a .. Over ninety 3% of human beings supported him on September 20, 2001 whilst he mentioned "we will coach no great distinction between the terrorists, or the countries who harbor them." So have been you element of the different 7%? Or are you like all different 70% who in basic terms replaced their minds?
2016-10-21 08:30:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, let's look at his accomplishments and decide:
1) Securing the country after it's worst attack in history and not allowing another one to happen.
2) Removing one of the most vile ruthless dictators since Stalin and Hitler, a dictator who had killed over 2 million people, most of them civilians.
3) Offering people a great tax break which put the money that American's earned back into their own pockets.
4) According the the US Treasurer, has created the best global economy in the last 60 years. Just because we have a deficit doesn't mean the economy isn't thriving.
5) Extremely low unemplyoment rate
I could go on forever but I'm sick of typing.
To answer in a word, no.
I'm not sure who the worst ever is, but, Clinton did have at least 3 chances to kill Osama and did not take them, which resulted in 9/11. That's a pretty hard one to beat, regardless of his economical prosperity.
2007-07-14 20:42:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
van Buren, Fillmore, Hoover, and Grant are the worst Presidents we have ever had and will stand out as the worst for many years. And some people would say in the last 40 years Carter was worst than Bush or Clinton.
2007-07-14 20:48:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by oldcorps1947 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
We should probably let a little actual history pass before we decide whether Bush will go down in history as the worst president ever, don't ya think?
2007-07-14 20:32:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by TheOrange Evil 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
1) Entered a war for
a. Corporate greed (via the military-industrial complex)
b. Oil
2) His inability as commander in chief has cost the lives of 3000 Americans and thousands more Iraqi citizens.
3) He has established military tribunals. Waved due process and has allowed SUSPECTS to be held for an indefinite amount of time.
4) Has sponsored "open borders" through his support of the latest immigration bill.
a. To provide Corporate America with a cheap labor force.
5) Most secretive administration in US history.
a. The VP has gone as far as declaring his office separate from the executive branch in an effort to hide his secrets.
Nixon comes in a close second place for advocating with the aid of Kaiser HMO system which has effectively slayed more Americans than any war ever fought.
2007-07-14 20:59:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
only history will be the judge of that, but its not looking too rosy for the guy now. the "uniter" not only divided this country, he quartered it! he has successfully managed to split both parties, whose ideologies were already growing further and further apart in half. and his continued disregard for the constitution is not doing him any favors. oh wait, he doesn;t have to abide by the constitution because neither his office or the vps office are a part of the executive branch (heard that expansion of cheneys argument for privacy on npr this past week)
2007-07-14 20:36:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by economic_anarchist 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
At least to this point he will . Lets hope that the world court arraigns him and his cronies on genocide and war crimes. I hope the masses in this country wake up to the facts that we have never been in a worse situation if the history of our country as viewed inside and outside of this magnificent country of ours by all countries both allies and enemies
2007-07-14 20:46:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by weoui 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
2007-07-14 21:17:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Adam J 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
gawd, here we go again... lol
Yes! In my lifetime, anyway... long-g-g lifetime.
This is getting a bit redundant though. It makes me wonder if we aren't all adding a bit to the diversionary tactics, here.
Maybe we can start writing about the goodness of this country, for a change. Maybe if we ignore him, he'll just go away! lmao!
2007-07-14 20:43:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ro40rd 3
·
0⤊
0⤋