Do you think a juror was bribed? O.J. Simpson and Michael Jackson. Guilty or not guilty?

Question

Do you think someone bribed a jury member? What is your opinion?

MAKE SURE TO ENTER MY AVATAR CONTEST WHICH CURRENTLY HAS 140 ENTRIES:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ary1Dubx9Lg5rAWo4IDrR27sy6IX?qid=20070715171850AAhGfKy
Thank you!

Answer 1

OJ is guilty. Why did he run from he cops? If he was innocent then he had no reason to run. He may have not done it with his own hands, but paid someone to do it. And Michael is guilty as well. He had to have done something for 2 people to accuse him of the same thing. I believe the jury was bought.

Answer 2

The think what mostly decided it for the O.J. case was the fact that the glove didn't fit. As if it would be a problem buying a smaller glove and wiping blood on it and saying "Oh, it wasn't mine, I can't even wear that glove, it's too small!" I don't think that the jury was bribed. I think that it mostly has to be a unanimous vote so most of them have to vote either guilty or not guilty....I think it varies depending on court to court on whether they all say not guilty or just 1 of them disagrees, but 1 of them being paid off or bribed isn't going to matter much. I think it was just their own stupidty. As for Michael Jackson? The man is sealed his own fate. I don't have a thing against blacks, but this is a black man wanting to be a white woman that molests kids....no one is going to trust him anymore....whether he has gone to jail or not. He is a freak of the upmost kind. His songs are kinda good, but that is the best thing that I can say for the man. But he had plenty oppurtunity to do whatever he wanted with those kids. I'd probably say guilty to them both.

Answer 3

I think them both guilty, and I think the juries in both cases knew them both to be guilty as well. I don't think there was a bribe involved but rather something else in the heart of the jurors (along with the heart of the criminals themselves).

One day both of these men, along with the jurors from both cases, will stand before God Himself and He will be Judge.

Answer 4

From the bottom of my heart I truly believe that if you are a celebrity or one of the precious rich and famous like Nicole Richey and Paris Hilton, the law does not apply to you because as one of the privlidged, you can afford to "pay" for your mistake and then go whining and crying about how many millions it cost for legal and attorney fees. Whaaah!

I guarantee that if you or I had committed a crime 1/2 the magnitude of O.J. or Paris. our rumps would not see daylight for a very long time.....but then normal people don't go around commiting crimes! Paris and Nicole are spoiled above and beyond the meaning of the term. O.J. is a sociopath! Nuf said. Nana

Answer 5

I think O.J. got off because they were afraid of riots and someone persuaded the jurors some how.With Michael I'm sure he bribed someone.I mean he bribed the parents to let him do his business with their children (that makes them sicker than he is) so I'm sure a juror or two was a cinch.

Answer 6

I don't know much about the Michael Jackson case, But in the case of OJ, he had great lawyers and a mostly black jury and Mark Fuhrman getting caught using N-word didn't help the prosecution any. So no, I don't think anyone was bribed in OJ's case. Oh yeah, OJ-Guilty. Michael Jackson- Undecided

Answer 7

I think the jury in both cases were dazzled by stardom, and perhaps a defense team that didn't put the evidence together a cohesive, compelling manner that would insure a guilty plea.

Answer 8

I think in the OJ Simpson verdict it was jury nullification. And I believe their is a high probality that money was involved somehow in the Michael Jackson case. That's just my opinion.

Answer 9

Probably not, but you have to remember that in today's courts, it pays to be rich so you can have a squad of lawyers nitpicking everything, including the number of staples in the court documents.

It does not matter if you committed the crime or not. In today's courts all that matters is who plays the best game. Acting is a big part of being a defense lawyer and those clowns were rich enough to hire the best actors.

Answer 10

OJ replaced into as responsible as they arrive (i've got examine some books) and that i think of there's some fifty-fifty probability that Michael replaced into responsible. Leaning extra in the direction of questioning he probably did have some pedophilic dispositions. yet he's ineffective, so i'd desire to be burned on the stake for asserting that,