English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

19 answers

It is certainly one of those debatable topics. I think space research will continue no matter the cost. It has always been human nature to explore and colonize. Now that we have used all of the land on Earth, we witness that spirit again by the desire to move forward out of the Earth and continue to search for habitable land.

The money used for space research could definitely be used somewhere else, but it all goes down to the priority list. Some people feel space research is important, and others think it is a waste of money. Some people don't believe in so much welfare, and some people think there's too little.

I think there needs to be a balance. The welfare of the people is very important, and so is to have the hope of searching for new places in new worlds. Science has always fueled the future and developments in outer space could add to the our knowledge of useful science (technology). It, however, absolutely does not mean then that we neglect the struggling people, just that there has to be a balance in the funding.

2007-07-14 17:53:13 · answer #1 · answered by Eric 2 · 0 0

Money spent on space research is jobs. The money does not leave the earth. The amount by which our living standard (poor and rich) has risen because of research into space exploration would be difficult to fathom. Computer systems, microwaves I don't know but liek I said the money stays here and is paid to people and they spend it and it is spent again and again. Jobs, business, taxes, welfare all get a cut in the end. I once thought like you. They left a six millon dollar car on the moon! A waste I thought. About $100 worth of metal was left there.

2007-07-14 17:47:32 · answer #2 · answered by cold_fearrrr 6 · 0 0

How much money do you spend to stay alive? Probably more than everything else. So in the future when the (Poor) Earth has no space for human life, we should look for a second home. So who can help you that time? Certainly just Researchers can help you find your destination. Beside that many years after that the sun will kill you. So you should run away as fast as possible. This money is not a waste; It an investment.

2007-07-14 18:01:31 · answer #3 · answered by Hossein S 1 · 0 0

Agreed. If you ran the world, then you can cut space exploration, and spend that money on welfare. Of course, under that scenario, you can also take the trillions spent on national defense and use that for welfare too. That would be very nice, but human society doesn't work like that. If we now cut NASA funding, that money may well go to waste in some pork barrel project, like a highway to nowhere. Better use the money in a way that at least promotes technological advance and the improvement of our living standards, as it is used now, for NASA.

2007-07-14 17:47:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Amount of money given to NASA in 2008: $17 billion

Amount of money spent on health care and social welfare programs in 2008: $800 billion.

Do you really think the piddling amount of money from NASA would make a hell of a difference? If they can't sort it all out with $800 billion, what are they going to do differently with 817 billion?

Space research benefits us here on Earth. NASA doesn't just load up the rockets with cash and fire it into space. Your computer, video technology, even some medical advances are a result of the space program. Get your facts right before crying out about wasted funds.

2007-07-15 00:45:38 · answer #5 · answered by Jason T 7 · 1 0

I think they should cut some spending and funding and it should be used for Health Care. Welfare to me is iffy. Health Care however I feel should be given to everyone somehow. No one should have to die because they can't afford a Dr. Welfare on the other hand is abused in many cases. It started out to help those who needed help getting back on their feet...not for lazy slobs who make no effort. I've seen both, not everyone on Welfare abuses it but I'd bet more than half at least do. I saw a special following six women struggling and on Welfare and only ONE made it. The others quit their jobs, one went back to her drug problem and let them take her kids away. One thing that those who failed had in common were a million excuses. Now show me my tax money, or some space money going to see someone getting health care who would otherwise not and it would be worthwhile.

2007-07-14 17:49:44 · answer #6 · answered by brat789456 4 · 0 0

If we've been to take each and every of the money spent on the gap software and used it to residing house and feed human beings, in the top, we'd nonetheless have ravenous undesirable human beings. the thought funds spent on the gap software may well be greater suitable spent on feeding human beings overlooks the effective impacts the gap software has had in the worldwide and human beings as an entire, yet overlooks the reality that maximum folk of starvation on the earth isn't through an actually loss of money or nutrition yet to environmental and human created circumstances jointly with conflict, political conflict, illness unfold oftentimes by making use of irresponsability, undesirable making plans, drought, and different natueral failures compounded by making use of loss of perpardedness. the gap software, on the different hand, has given us the skill to video reveal out planet from the sky, which has given us the skill to foretell the climate like by no skill before, and has allowed us to video reveal, and asses injury from organic and artifical distasters alike and to greater suitable help us avert them. That aside, examine initially funded below the gap software has contributed to mainstream technologies and deliver approximately advances in the scientific container which has saved distinctive lives. people who say the gap software is a waste of taxpayer funds are people who've needless to say by no skill actually regarded into the project and think of it rather is not something greater advantageous than human beings spending billions of dollars to floar around the Earth some situations and look into quite stars.

2016-12-14 09:10:52 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

You should get your facts straight before shooting off your mouth in this way. The amount of money spent of space research is piddly compared to the money spent of social programs. On the other hand, the limited money that is spent on space research has yielded great value which I'm sure you are completely ignorant of.

2007-07-14 19:17:39 · answer #8 · answered by Michael da Man 6 · 1 0

most people are poor because of the lifestyle they chose, laziness, gambling, drinking, drugs, having 6 six kids, etc...even if you gave money to these people, they would not do anything worthwhile with it.

i already pay so much in taxes that poor people get, and if they got more, well i guess i and others like me would stop working and go on welfare too and then our society would fall to crap.

haven't you ever read Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand? people that do research are part of the motor of the world.

note: i'm not saying that ALL poor people are like this.

2007-07-14 19:22:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A LOT of money is already spent on poor people, a helluva lot more that on space research. Apparently you have a computer - why, when the money could have been spent on the poor?

Research is the reason you even have a computer.

2007-07-14 17:41:16 · answer #10 · answered by Gary H 6 · 5 0

fedest.com, questions and answers