English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm faced with a deciscon tomorrow and I'm getting nervous, I live in the East Bay now and may decide to move to South Lake.

What do you think?

2007-07-14 17:14:26 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

They are both in Cali.

2007-07-14 17:18:03 · update #1

I got the job in South Lake and I took it.

Thanks for the comments.

2007-07-16 15:02:20 · update #2

7 answers

Stay in Cali

2007-07-14 17:17:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

It's a 4 hour drive to Lake Tahoe from the S.F. Airport Come east on I-80 to Sacramento then take 50 east. That will take you right into S L T.

2016-05-17 23:56:11 · answer #2 · answered by georgette 3 · 0 0

I love the East Bay, but South Lake is really pretty. Both are pretty expensive. South Lake is small and not real cultural, if you're into that sort of thing (theatre, museums, etc.) If you're into skiing and the outdoors, then South Lake is your best bet!

Good Luck :)

2007-07-14 17:33:30 · answer #3 · answered by brojonesmom 3 · 0 0

south lake tahoe for sure fresh air, trees ,lake no gangs ect

east bay gangs, bad air, rude people,filth drugs ect

i have lived in both tahoe was great swimming sking ect i miss it still

2007-07-14 17:24:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i would live in San Francisco Bay

2007-07-14 17:18:19 · answer #5 · answered by juanita2_2000 7 · 0 0

I think Frisco is a lot nicer, but it's cheaper to live in Tahoe.

2007-07-14 17:17:47 · answer #6 · answered by ßỰŦŤΣЯ§! Guess who's back...for now! 6 · 0 0

Wtf? SF Bay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Duh. :)

2007-07-14 17:18:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anna 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers