2007-07-14 16:46:03 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Aside from a few fanatics, nobody does.....
You seem to be confusing the right to choose with being pro-abortion, and confusing constitutional protections with being soft on crime.
Sadly, both of these confusions are common. But the right to choose has nothing to do with abortion. It is solely about govt regulation of reproductive choice. And constitutional protections apply regardless of who the accused is -- that's the way the consitution was written.
2007-07-14 16:50:37 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 6⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe in abortion. Abortion is taking away the life of a potential gnius, hero, or anything else you can think of! But I think the reason we keep murderers alive is to make them suffer from what they have done! The point of prison is to suffer. Prison is a terrible place. I would much rather see a murderer behind bars having to use the toilet in front of everyone, eating the nasty food, sleeping on the thin matresses, and living in filth. They did something terrible and they need to have something terrible done to them. I think that killing a murderer lets them go. Its like freeing them. Because if you let them die they dont have to face the punishment and torture that they go through to pay for what they have done. Killing them show them that they got away with and thats is exavtly what they wanted. They wanted to get away with murder and killing them lets them.
2007-07-14 23:58:39 · answer #2 · answered by turtlesandgummybears 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Killing Babies? Got your own ideas dont you?
You are welcome to your ideas. I've got mine.
Remember when you were 1 minute old? Remember when you were 1 week old? What you
are saying is you are phychic and know how you must have felt. You think a mother to be decisons
to abort are murderous? Not married are you?
2007-07-15 00:09:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Gee--maybe you could word your question in an even more inflammatory fashion, do you think?
NO ONE "believes in killing babies." The question is whether you would like the government to make your medical decisions or whether you want to make them yourself with your doctor. Which would you personally prefer?
I find it ironic that the very people who think it would be OK for the government to tell a woman whether to carry her fetus to term are the same people who fight national health insurance because they don't want government intrusion in their lives and they think the government would botch things. So why would a woman want government intrusion, especially if they're going to botch things? Get philosophically consistent, at least.
2007-07-14 23:58:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I guess there just trying to avoid paying all that money to house convicted murderers, by killing babies before they grow up to be murderers.
2007-07-14 23:50:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The baby doesn't remember the pain, so the baby doesn't feel pain. Murderers feel pain, and you don't know what goes on in the afterlife. They suffer more behind bars, and what if you've got the wrong person behind bars?
2007-07-14 23:50:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never could figure that out. They would kill the innocent, but let the guilty live.
2007-07-14 23:49:46 · answer #7 · answered by Sweetharttt 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know, Liberals have a very irregular train of thought.
2007-07-15 01:31:42 · answer #8 · answered by Gump023 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because of the spread of the plague of liberalism, which affects people's minds and spirits.
2007-07-14 23:48:21 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
well, i'm against abortion and the death penalty. I think it's inconsistent to be for one and against the other.
2007-07-14 23:52:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋