I don't think he has any. He's being told what to do and just a mouthpiece.
2007-07-14 13:42:08 · 10 answers · asked by greenie 6 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
ritefielder14: These are statements/oppinions of liberal policians, not facts. I can read this stuff any day on the net or papers or see them on TV
Do you have a sayso on your own? or are you a follower of oppinions. If so, shiat god have mercy on this county
2007-07-14 15:02:05 · update #1
If he has any, he shares it with these people:
"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
They all thought that Saddam was a threat but once the war started to lose public popularity, they all flip-flopped and apposed it.
2007-07-14 13:48:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonnnn24424 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I have heard or read from pretty much every White House journalist that I deem creditable that Bush has the final say on the issues, he does have a cabinet and advisers as every President does.
How could it anyone else? Its clearly a half-witted, ate up flag sucker who sees the word as black and white and not a West point educated general that is calling the shots in this thing. that sounds like W huh? Cheney wouldn't want to spend so much, he is against big government. It is a because of convenience that Haliburton gets these deals. I bought a car from my friend. It was convenient. That's what I gather here anyway.
Ritefielder.. those are politicians.. It is never pretty for a politician when the nut cutting hour comes. Those Congressmen and Congress women were shown beefed up evidence that was later proven to be:
1. false
2. taken from bad intelligence
3 taken from people who had been tortured.
The President and his men and women were going out of their way to lie to the American people, the UN, the world and our military. They wanted to go ahead with this war no matter what for whatever reason.
Imagine the **** storm that would have occurred had any of those congressmen or congresswomen said ,"W is a right out liar! There are no weapons of mass destruction."... they would have lost their jobs as soon as they said that! EVERYBODY in the electorate perhaps even those Congressmen and Congresswomen were sold on that bunk evidence
Is it really so bad to "man up" and admit you were wrong?
OK so they didn't sacrifice their careers... but fear was the deterrent....
Snip. Snip.
2007-07-14 23:41:48 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As he likes to say, he's the "decider" and consitutionally speaking, has the final say. On ther other hand, it's pretty obvious for most people that Cheney does the heavy lifting when it comes to doing the thinking. I'm not saying that he's right; I'm only pointing out what should be pretty obvious.
2007-07-14 20:53:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I disagree. Bush is Constitutionally commander-in-chief of the armed forces, and knows quite well what he wants to accomplish. He must, of course, rely on subordinates to actually get things done, but is quite able to interpret reports from the field.
2007-07-14 20:47:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
He doesn't have squat. Whatever he says is voted on and if too many people in office disagree his words are just that words . Nothing else.
2007-07-14 20:49:54 · answer #5 · answered by Williamstown 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
about 50 lbs.
2007-07-14 21:16:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree, Babs is the real power in the family
2007-07-14 20:54:57 · answer #7 · answered by a person of interest 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He's the Commander-In-Chief! It's doesn't get any "weightier" than that!
Sheesh! WHAT are they teaching in public schools these days?
2007-07-14 21:19:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
-3514514562145 pounds.
2007-07-14 20:44:51 · answer #9 · answered by M. 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
ritefielder14..perfect answer!
2007-07-14 21:58:15 · answer #10 · answered by parrothead 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋