Of course they are. It's a lot easier than trying to answer for your own dismal record.
2007-07-14 13:35:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mitchell . 5
·
2⤊
7⤋
Blaming Clinton for what? What are you asking? With 75% people saying they don't approve of Bush, are you trying to get people to rant and rave and put him down some more? If that's your point, it's getting kind of tired. He'll be out in a year. Look forward to knowing he will be gone and there's nothing Carl Rove can do about it.
2007-07-14 13:37:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Meng-Tzu 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
Yes, they are and it's disgusting.
Clinton brought prosperity to the American people and at least tried to handle foreign affairs diplomatically. Yet the then-Republican Congress impeaches him for lying about sex (something that 99.9% of Americans do).
Contrast that with the GOP's abysmal record. Tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy at the expense of the working and middle class. Pointless, illegal, and seemingly endless war where over 3,600 American soldiers have been killed. A disgraced former Speaker of the House (Newt Gingrich) who committed infidelities FAR WORSE than anything Clinton ever did, and he gets away with it scott free. And, yeah, fearmongering (something Clinton never did).
Congress, if you're reading this, impeach Bush and Cheney immediately! Begin impeachment proceedings MONDAY MORNING!
2007-07-14 13:57:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I blame Clinton. Some Republicans are letting the media get to them. They are pushed by "peer pressure" because "everyone thinks Bush is going a bad job"
2007-07-14 13:37:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tina 2
·
2⤊
3⤋
Are you even old enough to remember what Clinton's approval rating was but it wasn't much higher than what Bush's is right now so don't even try to squawk about it.
2007-07-14 14:39:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think men are jealous of Clinton (Bill) because they never had a bj.
and Bush could care less about his approval rating. We simply wait until the inevitable.
when he
falls
on
his
own
sword.
2007-07-14 13:37:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by rare2findd 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
Yes, but it goes farther than that. Republicans blame the governor in Louisiana for Katrina failures, liberals for the debacle in Iraq, the Army for failures in Iraq (Rice: "no strategic failure, but thousands of failures on the ground"), and 'them' for snafus in general ("you're either for us or with the terrorists"). It's a congenital inability to accept responsibility for one's actions.
2007-07-15 06:16:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by pasdeclef 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
They both have had their share of screw ups but I wonder if when Bush is no longer in office and his name comes up will people say Oh forget it he's no longer in office, why do you want to bring up the past.
2007-07-14 13:53:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by hdean45 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Republicans have much better things to do than waste their time on slick willy, trust me! I don't care about polls and I maintain that Mr. Bush is doing his level best in a damn miserable situation! BTW, now that we're here, how's YOUR congress doing?
2007-07-14 14:28:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Excellent well thought out response john b. When you cant think of an answer, go with calling someone shthead.
Thank you for deleting your response john b. It was ill advised to leave it there, but does not say much of your convictions to take it down.
2007-07-14 13:36:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by dCon 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
happy Saturday Neddie,yes they are,and yes Bush is below 25%.your question seems to have broken the republican silance.good,let them think,and stop comparing to clinton,im sick of that mentality...cheers by
2007-07-14 13:49:43
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋