are these good fantasy football league settings?

Question

QB, WR, WR, RB, RB, TE, W/T, K, D, D, D, DB, DB, DB, DB, DL, DL, DL, DL, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN

Passing Yards (25 yards per point; 5 points at 500 yards)
Passing Touchdowns (6)
Interceptions (-2)
Rushing Yards (20 yards per point; 5 points at 200 yards)
Rushing Touchdowns (6)
Reception Yards (20 yards per point; 5 points at 175 yards)
Reception Touchdowns (6)
Return Touchdowns (10)
2-Point Conversions (2)
Fumbles Lost (-2)
Offensive Fumble Return TD (10)
Field Goals 0-19 Yards (2)
Field Goals 20-29 Yards (2.5)
Field Goals 30-39 Yards (3)
Field Goals 40-49 Yards (4)
Field Goals 50+ Yards (5)
Point After Attempt Made (1)
Tackle Solo (1)
Tackle Assist (.5)
Sack (2.5)
Interception (2.5)
Fumble Force (1.5)
Fumble Recovery (1.5)
Touchdown (6.5)
Safety (2.5)
Pass Defended (1)
Block Kick (4.5)

btw if you want to join the ID is187344 and the password is football

live draft sunday night

i actually took away a RB, so there are only 1 on each team but Im trying to make the rosters are realistic as possible

thanks for the input guys, I revised, take a look

QB, WR, WR, RB, TE, W/T, K, D, D, D, DB, DB, DL, DL, DL, 5 bench spots

Passing Yards (25 yards per point; 1 points at 300 yards; 2 points at 400 yards; 5 points at 500 yards)
Passing Touchdowns (6)
Interceptions (-2)
Rushing Yards (20 yards per point; 1 points at 125 yards; 2 points at 150 yards; 5 points at 200 yards)
Rushing Touchdowns (6)
Reception Yards (20 yards per point; 1 points at 100 yards; 2 points at 150 yards; 5 points at 200 yards)
Reception Touchdowns (6)
Return Touchdowns (8)
2-Point Conversions (2)
Fumbles Lost (-2)
Offensive Fumble Return TD (8)
Field Goals 0-19 Yards (2)
Field Goals 20-29 Yards (2.5)
Field Goals 30-39 Yards (3)
Field Goals 40-49 Yards (4)
Field Goals 50+ Yards (5)
Point After Attempt Made (1)
Tackle Solo (1)
Tackle Assist (.5)
Sack (2.5)
Interception (2.5)
Fumble Force (1.5)
Fumble Recovery (1.5)
Touchdown (6.5)
Safety (2.5)
Pass Defended (1)
Block Kick (4.5)

Answer 1

yes mit looks very fair to me

Answer 2

The bonus points for yardage are too much. For one thing it's highly unlikely that a qb throws for 500 in a game so no one will every get that bonus, but there will be a fair number of 200 yard rushing and 175 yard receiving games.

This might just be a personal thing, but a field goal is a field goal is a field goal. I can see a bonus point for a long one (say 46 yards or more) but other than that I think it's silly. For that matter, a touchdown is a touchdown. Return touchdowns might change the momentum in a real game, but they are still only worth 6 on the scoreboard. If your real world team is down 10 with 90 seconds to go and you return a punt for a td and the point after, you still have to get the onside kick and then score or you lose anyway, momentum be damned.

It looks like you plan on drafting individual players at every position on defense. I have to admit I've never seen that. And hope I never do in any league I'm actually playing in. There is no way I want to be trying to decide from cornerback A (average 2.2 fantasy points/game) and cornerback B (1.9 pts/game but with upside!) in round 33 of the draft. Stick with a team D and maybe one individual defenseive player.

Answer 3

I wanted to say that the defense is getting the royal treatment in your league. You should have more offense (two RB and three wide with a flex spot for RB/WR and WR/TE).

Then, I read the answerer who had NEVER SEEN the defensive IDP format (picking Ray Lewis instead of the whole Baltimore team defense). There are many of them available in Yahoo! Private leagues right now, and also at www.scorsheetsports.com/football where I have had a team for 12 years. I won't play team defense ever again if I can help it. That's a cop out. Besides, I can have Zach Thomas, Keith Bulluck and Ray Lewis on the same team! THAT's a fantasy defense.

Answer 4

I wouldn't join it...too many defensive players for my liking

Answer 5

way too many defensive players, otherwise its fine, i gess.

Answer 6

Yea, that's pretty good.