At least with Armageddon we could blame the Bible for the outcome.
2007-07-14 11:10:05 · 17 answers · asked by ? 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
How do you know they will not be one in the same?
2007-07-18 03:59:47 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
armageddon is, i believe, the end of life as we know it: the destruction of the world; a biblical, in the christian way of thinking. So, if you disobay, (watch) any of the 10 commandements (sp) or if we all do at the same time, we is all DOOMED!. Silly. USA, as a "super power", is on the way.
Now just be natural, don't turn out to look like Joan Rivers.
Age naturally, forget "botex", et al.
Iraq? Viet Nam?. What has USA accomplished. I hear it costs 1 trillion a week to kill the innocent Iraq innocents. A billion a weel could cure cancer and give everyone in USA universial health care. MMMMh. Armageddon? We is on the way. Just a note from a Humanist. Sweet dreams........
2007-07-14 18:23:04 · answer #2 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Iraq.
We are doing amazing things in Iraq. I have been reading the writings of Michael Yon (www.michaelyon-online.com) and other sources, and we are making a difference in the world.... the for good. We are WINNING in Iraq. We are giving people a chance that never would have had a change otherwise. Women are treated like human beings, they get to go to school. Very violent cities are not safe to walk in alone at night. The Aamar Provence is even becoming safe.
We are doing great things in Iraq. We need to keep it up, finish the job, and we can bring our boys home soon.
2007-07-14 18:16:40 · answer #3 · answered by Mike 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The war isn't against Iraq. And I'll take that.
Armageddon is the end of days, death to ALL, extinguishing of all lives.
2007-07-14 18:18:33 · answer #4 · answered by The prophet of DOOM 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Armageddon at least is supposed to have an end
2007-07-17 19:59:13 · answer #5 · answered by xg6 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Armageddon It is a good song... anyways... I say Bush's war. Hindsight is always 20/20 though right?
2007-07-14 18:13:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
the war in Iraq. only because we can control the outcome.
2007-07-14 18:50:26 · answer #7 · answered by Razgriz01 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No comparison, Iraq of course.
Write and ask Hillary.
She has a 666 birthmark on the top of her head, and she has cloven hooves, just like Nancy Pelosi.
2007-07-14 18:15:10 · answer #8 · answered by wolf 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Armageddon at least all the destruction is done right away and it has nothing to do with oil.
2007-07-14 18:12:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Depends....
Am I shooting or being shot at?
I think I'd take Armageddon... Bruce Willis could save us, and I think Liv Tyler is soooooo HOT!
g-day!
2007-07-14 18:15:59 · answer #10 · answered by Kekionga 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hey there is no way I'll fight for big oil. So Armageddon
and people who are claiming that we are winning in Iraq for them two words "Mission accomplished"
2007-07-14 18:21:44 · answer #11 · answered by thebestbotintexas 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋