Only in a Society that is doing it's damndest to change a free nation into a Socialist one. We're almost there, if we continue to allow Libs to lie to us, and take our freedoms away.
2007-07-14 11:02:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by xenypoo 7
·
1⤊
5⤋
Yep! Wonder what Fox removes!
You Tube routinely purges anti Bush videos.
Many that are carried on Yahoo are only carried for a short time. Go the the originator, which was on of the majors I believe! I am sure it is still out there!
IT is here if you want to see it!
http://www.care2.com/news/member/956805373/173210
He's as ugly as Michael Moore! And dresses the same!
I didn't find it anti-American. I find what is being done to us Anti-American! I know that much of that is fact, however, would like to see some real evidence.
There is no doubt that the government disconnected gold from money and gave us a piece of paper, there is no doubt that the Constitution allows the US Government to print money, without it going through a Federal Reserve Bank that is not a government entity at all!
Some I am not so sure of. I need a little more proof, though it is true that Bush is building 600 concentration camps around the US. It is also true that George Bush tried to take away our liberties under the Military Commissions Act of 2006, and it is also true that the constitution gives him the authority to declare Martial Law. Whether he tries to misuse this is yet to be seen!
And Google didn't remove it so you owe them an apology!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1616088001333580937&q=freedom+to+fascism
2007-07-14 18:14:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
As a private company, they can remove anything they want from their servers, and their service. Freedom of speech protections only limit government censorship, not private action.
As far as why they did it, possibly because of copyright problems. There are two films/videos that have used that title, and one of them was based on an earlier copyrighted work as its derived source. If Google was aware that it was violating copyright, and received a request from the copyright holder to take it down, then that's a good reason to do so.
2007-07-14 18:01:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Never saw the video.
But here are the guidelines, and they do have a right to show or not show any video. It is their right, just like I can't tell you that you have to watch "Dancing with the Stars".
As set forth in the Terms & Conditions, Google Video is not required to host or display uploaded content. Google Video may refuse to host content that violates its policies, including:
illegal content
invasions of personal privacy
pornography or obscenity
hate or incitement of violence
graphic violence or other acts resulting in serious injury or death
violations of copyright. Please see our DMCA policy for more information.
Please note that we also reserve the right to not show mature content to users with their safesearch activated. This includes content that would typically not be shown to users under 18 years of age.
We may change these policies at any time without notice.
If that video fell under any of those, in their eyes, and it is up to their opinion on if it did or not, then they pulled it.
2007-07-14 18:02:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Sure it's legal. They own the web site. If I don't want to sell candy in my store, I don't have to. People who love candy may protest but, they can buy it somewhere else if they need it that much.
2007-07-14 18:34:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by mecasa 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course it's legal. They're not a public broadcaster. They can remove whatever they want. It's their site.
Like Yahoo! answer, they probably remove stuff when they get too many complaints.
2007-07-14 18:01:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Its Google's website they can do whatever they want with the vidoes posted on their site.
2007-07-14 18:00:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by thewanton19 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
Of course it's legal.
2007-07-14 18:02:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
freedom of speech or anything else, does not exist in the corporate world.
2007-07-14 18:04:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by economic_anarchist 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
that movie was really Anti American to me
2007-07-14 18:18:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jeremy P 2
·
0⤊
1⤋