English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

non-arbritary answers please

2007-07-14 10:49:15 · 3 answers · asked by Book of Changes 3 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

3 answers

No. There are no GOOD reasons for any given state to have the first primary. Even if we accept that primaries should be spread over time (a separate debate), there is no good reason for a specific state to be first.

2007-07-14 10:58:14 · answer #1 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 2 0

1- to piss off the republicans
2- because they can
3-to piss off the republicans
4- because they are the largest,most powerful State in the Union
5- to piss off the republicans

2007-07-14 17:53:30 · answer #2 · answered by Your Teeth or Mine? 5 · 3 0

because of all the Mexicans that live there ?

2007-07-14 18:30:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers