English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Instead of Insults, digressing, writing nonsense and general sophistry......

CONS its about time you had a coherent argument to defend your indefensible positions.

You have been wrong for 7 years and like a 'chickenhawk' it is all coming home to roost.

2007-07-14 10:27:40 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

6 answers

These Bush-bot idiots would stand and defend him and call him a good and moral man if he ate boiled babies for breakfast. They would find some way to rationalize it and justify it. Probably would say God told him to do it.

2007-07-14 10:32:55 · answer #1 · answered by kolacat17 5 · 2 3

It would help if you could enumerate the "indefensible positions" that we are supposed to defend, instead of making sweeping generalizations. Just what have we "chickenhawks" been wrong about for 7 years...EVERYTHING...or certain things in particular? If you are saying that we are wrong about EVERYTHING, then I think I would have to respond that you are simply a hate-monger and have no stand...just hate. If you have something specifically that we are wrong about, then that is reasonable and we can talk.

2007-07-14 11:18:59 · answer #2 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 0 1

zzzzzzzzzz

BTW, why would you ask anyone to defend an indefensible position?

2007-07-14 10:31:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I support Bush 100% except his view on the immigration reform.

Who do you support? Al Gore/Hilary....good luck

2007-07-14 10:32:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I don't think there is any logical way to defend him.

2007-07-14 10:30:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

DUH! WATERMELON!

2007-07-14 10:56:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers