When asked why he felt there should be less candidates at the debates, he responded that it should be split into two debates (with the contestants selected randomly.) YEAH FREAKIN RIGHT!!! That just shows how he can twist anything into an excellent proposal with no substance. His campaign unravaled in my eyes...
2007-07-14 07:09:08 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
theresacrider: Obviously Edwards did not have that in mind when he wispered in her ear! Hello!!!
And I'm a liberal I'm not just attacking Democrats or anything. Liars aren't as bad as crooks like Guiliani!!!
2007-07-14 07:14:27 · update #1
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070714/ap_on_el_pr/kucinich_edwards_debate
2007-07-14 07:18:14 · update #2
He proved to be a professional liar.
2007-07-14 07:13:28 · answer #1 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
It shows why his poll numbers are where they are now, most people after 2004 and his movement since then see him as the ambulance chasing lawyer he has always been. I am not a fan of Kucinich but he has a right to be angry about Edwards and especially since Edwards is now lying more to try to get his way out of the mess he created for the democrats. Hillary should never have answered his question because she will to a small part be pulled into it also.
2007-07-14 07:42:16 · answer #2 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Of course he is full of it. Check out Dennis Kucinich's site if you want an honest man for president who is not ruled by special interest groups and large corporations.
2007-07-14 13:11:36 · answer #3 · answered by madgone82 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The debates should be trimmed to have only serious candidates. On the Democratic side, have 4 candidates (Clinton, Obama, Edwards, Richardson). On the Republican side, have 4 candidates (Giuliani, Thompson when he gets into the race, Romney, and McCain).
2007-07-14 07:13:30 · answer #4 · answered by The Stylish One 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
They all lie. It's what they do best. The best liar with the most money is who wins the election in the end.
2007-07-14 07:12:19 · answer #5 · answered by Cake 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Old Hilary did some twisting of her own as usual.
2007-07-14 08:07:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He was just telling Hillary what kind of Breck shampoo he is using and discussing each other's manhood.
2007-07-14 09:28:17 · answer #7 · answered by count_bongula666 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Explain the "whisper controversy"...nobody seems to know what you're talking about. Which part is "a lie".
2007-07-14 07:17:01 · answer #8 · answered by ArRo 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of course. Do you really expect him to handle this any differently than he has handled everything else?
2007-07-14 16:30:48 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
2 Americas.....2 debates....at least he is consistantly wrong.
2007-07-14 09:15:34 · answer #10 · answered by Corruptfile34 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋