http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070714/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq
The Iraqi PM says his government can handle the situation and the US can leave. So whatexcuse do the right-wingers have left for continuing to put our troops in danger?
2007-07-14 04:25:30 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
So, the Iraqi people want the US gone, and the US people want the US gone, and the Iraqi govt says we can leave, and Congress says we should leave....
It seems like Bush is the only one wanting us to stay.
When exactly did we become a dictatorship when one person gets to make all the decisions and ignore everyone else?
2007-07-14 04:30:36 · answer #1 · answered by coragryph 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I consistently theory the term stay the path replaced right into a tragic decision of words because of the fact it implies a bunker mentality. It won't be able to be denied that we want new recommendations for Iraq and have for awhile, yet our technique must be one centred on triumphing the day. we can win in Iraq and it won't be by using following the concepts of the ISG. mutually as a good number of what replaced into mentioned in the rfile is authentic their conclusions quantity to a backdoor renounce. If we would want to win in Iraq what we want is for the politicians to end attempting to run the conflict and turn it over to Generals. whilst politics drives the process any conflict the outcomes are consistently disastrous. This vogue began in Korea, persevered into Vietnam and is now being employed in Iraq. you will think of we'd have found out by using now.
2016-10-21 06:27:09 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm... So you think that pulling all the troops out is a smart idea? I would rather have troops who joined the military because they want to fight for their country in danger rather than withdraw all the troops from Iraq and let a mediocre security force over when al-Qaeda rebuilds to be stronger than they were before because politicians and the media tries to control warfare, which they know nothing about.
2007-07-14 04:27:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's really gonna get interesting if Maliki insists we leave, Bush refuses, the Iraqi Army that we've armed and trained takes up the Jihad, and turns against us,and then the ability to leave becomes much,much more difficult..The old adage is "You can lead a horse to water,but you can't make him drink", Well, you can offer help to the Iraqis ,but you can't make them accept it...(after they choose not to)
2007-07-14 04:33:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it is a right wing thing. I don't believe we can leave now and I am not right wing. I don't think the PM truly believes it himself. We will have to maintain a presence for sometime in this mess. The outcomes are either not very good or worse.
2007-07-14 04:29:26 · answer #5 · answered by Truth Erector 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have mentioned a dozen times before that we are in for the long hall in Iraq .
That we have built bases that are going to remain manned and we are never leaving till the oil runs out .
2007-07-14 04:28:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oops, I asked the same question at the same time, it just hasn't been posted yet.
Maliki is facing a no confidence vote in parliament. Bush and Cheney might pull strings and have a new prime minister installed.
2007-07-14 04:32:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, it looks like it's down to one man in the world who thinks the USA should stay in Iraq. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
2007-07-14 04:51:48 · answer #8 · answered by .... . .-.. .-.. --- 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we went into iraq for the oil......they can say they can handle things and they probably can but our government isnt going anywhere without the oil
2007-07-14 04:29:57 · answer #9 · answered by j _j_83221 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
he acknowledged the forces need further weapons and training. Read ALL of the link and not just the headline
2007-07-14 04:29:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋