Why did Pelosi put her own carrier before America and the Constitution??? Saying Impeachment is off the table?

Question

Should se be Impeached for not Impeaching Bush and Cheniev.

When will Team Red and Team Blue put the Constitution before the Game???

Answer 1

When will you guys realize that it's not going to happen and that the masses up there are supporting Bush, whether they admit to it or not. Get real.

And as far as your on line impeachment petitions go. Have you seen an increase in junk mail? If not, you should, cause your list has been sold to spammers. :)

Wake up America!!!!!

Answer 2

First, impeachment is discretionary on the part of Congress -- so, it's not a matter of putting anything before the Constitution. That would only apply if it was mandatory.

Second, what Pelosi and the House does doesn't matter. Even if they file a Bill of Impeachment, there no way, no possible way in this political climate, that the Senate would vote 2/3 to convict.

The fact that he's violated federal law is not at issue. He's a publicly admitted to intentional violations of federal laws (high crimes) and the Supreme Court has confirmed the violations. So, proving the prima facie (prosecution-side) of the case is a lock. But the reality and the facts and the law doesn't matter in this case. Because the Senate is not going to act based on the law -- they're going to vote based purely on politics.

Thus, any impeachment proceedings by the House would be an utter waste of time. It's like a prosecutor proceeding to trial when he knows all the jurors have been bribed by the defense. It would be a waste of time.

Answer 3

You guys just don't get it about impeachment. This process isn't primarily for the purpose of getting rid of Bush and Cheney. However, I disagree with the writer who said Bush hasn't done anything to warrant impeachment. He ordered Harriet Myers to ignore a subpoena to appear before the House. He is a co-conspirator in her failure to appear.

The REAL reason we impeach, whether or not it actually works, is to alert ALL branches of the government, and the American people, that the Executive Branch cannot allocate powers to itself simply because it says so. There must be Constitutional precedent to do so. Simply because there MAY not be a series of high crimes and mideameanors, doesn't mean the House Judiciary can't convene Articles of Impeachment. This process "sheds a bright light" on the ultra-secretive activities of the Bush administration, and is, in itself, a check and balance against FUTURE ADMINISTRATIONS who may be tempted to use the same power Bush and Cheney declared as their own.

Answer 4

CAROGRYPH hit the nail on the head. Pelosi could support an impeachment process, but it would probably fail, the Senate would not have enough votes to convict, the whole thing would take too long and Bush & Cheney would be out of office before it was over, and the nation will have gone through all of that bloodletting for nothing when more constructive ways of bringing about change could have happened. In short, Pelosi is d#@#ed if she does and d#@#ed if she doesn't, and it's more productive to be d#@#ed if she doesn't.

Answer 5

Because she, unlike you, knows the political reality. Impeachment is simply an indictment, not removal from office. It leads to a trial in the Senate, where Ms. Pelosi knows, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that there is absolutely no chance of a conviction, so we will end up wasting a ton of time for nothing. She also knows that she will pretty much write off any chance the Democrats have of winning the White House in 2008 and could easily lose the Congress as well if she tries it.

She also knows, unlike you and your misinterpretation of Madison's writings, that what has occurred comes nowhere near the "high crimes and misdemeanors" called for by the Constitution.

Answer 6

The President can only be impeached if he has committed a crime while in office. So far, President Bush has not committed a legitimate crime (and no...getting us into a war that Congress authorized based on bad intelligence is not a crime) that could lead to a possible impeachment.

Like it or not, until he actually breaks a law...he can't be impeached. And even the warrantless wiretapping of phones doesn't count. While normally that would be a crime, it was a privilege granted under the Patriot Act, also approved by Congress, and thus is legal until the Patriot Act is repealled.

In all honesty, there are no charges you bring against him at this time.

Answer 7

Things may be a smidge different now with the recent and ongoing GOP defections.

It was off the table before because it was pointless. The House could pass articles but whether or not he was ACTUALLY impeached depends upon the Senate. Until recently there was no way they'd get the 2/3 vote they needed to do it.

Now....still unlikely but it's becoming more possible.

Answer 8

properly, the conspiracy theorists have particularly plenty run that total impeachment factor into the floor so I won't answer by using going on the comparable properly trampled course. What you will desire to comprehend is that Pelosi is finding forward to the 2008 Presidential Elections and he or she is attentive to that commencing impeachment courtroom cases now would not accomplish something, George W. Bush can not be re-elected to workplace and Dick Cheney has already pronounced that he has no want to seek for the GOP nomination for 2008 elections. To waste the tax payers money and congresses time to hold impeachment courtroom cases that would desire to in no way be upheld because of the fact they'd't get 2/3 of the vote to be triumphant would probably positioned a foul style in the mouths of Republicans, Democrats and Independents alike. no person desires to make certain their elected officers waste their time and materials and our money for partisan politics which will accomplish no longer something. as some distance because of the fact the "finished Amnesty" factor, guess what, in basic terms approximately each incoming President has issued an entire amnesty to each outgoing President! particular, that includes William Jefferson Clinton receiving an entire amnesty from George W. Bush, and William Jefferson Clinton issued one for Bush Senior. it is achieved as a remember of retaining a former sitting President from criminal and civil action as quickly as they bypass away workplace and it incredibly is achieved as a remember of coverage inspite of regardless of if the outgoing President believes he's achieved something to need amnesty or no longer.

Answer 9

Priorities. She wants to stop the Iraq war first as do the vast majority of americans. If Bush was impeached - then we'd have to impeach Cheney too. It would take too long and the odds are the Iraq war would continue unabated and more innocent people would die. Was it the right decision? I don't know.

Answer 10

Maybe because she got off the short bus and realized that there is nothing to warrent impeachment Because Clintoon was impeached does not mean Bush has to be. The wheels on the short bus seem to be going flat, but that is Bush's fault Right