2007-07-14 03:31:19 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
With Nancy Pelosi leading the NAMBLA march no less..Eh, they're Liberals, which means no one is suppose to have differnt views than they do..
2007-07-14 03:37:08 · answer #1 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Would you care to post where you got such information? It seems your posting is for 'National Inquirer' effect, inflamatory statements with no proof or backing. NAMBLA, for all practical purposes, is no longer a via organization. It really does not exist other than on the internet. And during the year my job takes me to over 250 college campus across the country. On all of those colleges I visit, I have yet to see a college campus that had a NAMBLA branch nor have I seen a college campus that does not allow all of the military branches to have recruitment stations. Probably the exception to that would be private colleges which would have the right to exclude any organization it wishes.
2007-07-14 03:47:33 · answer #2 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I believe you are talking about the alleged incident in Seattle. This may have something to do with a young man who is in the guard and has been in Iraq/Afghanistan 3 times already. He went back to college to finish his engineering degree, but has been ordered back to Iraq after having been told his active duty was finished. He is suing the government. This was on MSNBC I believe.
However, I don't understand the need to run off the recruiters unless they became insulting to the students. Even then, I would think ignoring the recruiters would have been sufficient if they had no desire to join up.
2007-07-14 03:59:51 · answer #3 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you have ANYTHING to back this up or are you just farting out of your mouth the way most neocons do?
I'm not for NAMBLA being present anywhere! And I have no idea where you even get this from. Typical conservative bullshit.
Try to back up your posts before you post them. It makes you sound less like an idiot. Not much less... but I guess in your case every little bit helps.
2007-07-17 08:01:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That statement is false.I'm against military recruiters on college campus and would like to see NAMBLA outlawed.
The ACLU might have another opinion but I don't think free speech should cover their activities.They belong in jail or possibly a mental institution
2007-07-14 03:37:14 · answer #5 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Neither should be on a college campus. And while you're at it, get rid of the credit card companies that are like vultures.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And if I believe what you're saying about NAMBLA, why would they be interested in college aged boys?
2007-07-14 03:39:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
you recommend like Senator McCain a Conservative who pushed aside substantial Mike Almy for being gay besides the actuality that he served 13 years as an AF Officer interior the Senate Armed stress Committee looking over the DADT coverage
2016-10-01 14:30:36 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What the heck is NAMBLA?
2007-07-14 03:43:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Liberals can hem and haw all they want. Most college campuses are public land and the recruiters have every right to be there.
2007-07-14 03:35:10 · answer #9 · answered by gregpasq 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Maybe because recruiters are trying to 'lure' youngsters to their deaths?
NAMBLA certainly isn't!
2007-07-14 03:37:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋