If people believe that Intelligent Design (ID) should be taught as an alternative to the Theory of Evolution on the basis of evolution being just a theory, wouldn't it be extremely hypocritical to teach the Theory of Gravitation as fact. Shouldn't Intelligent Falling (IF) be taught as an alternative to gravitation as well? After all, gravitation is a theory, just like evolution.
We should also look for "Intelligent" alternatives to a whole lot of other theories (Acoustic Theory, The Theory of Relativity, Atomic Theory and Circuit Theory for instance).
2007-07-13 15:50:18 · 11 answers · asked by qxzqxzqxz 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The problem fundies have is in the definition of the word "Theory." If they had half a mind they would look up the word in the dictionary and see, "A body of the fundamental principles underlying a science or the application of a science: the "theory" of evolution." The fundies and their preachers are all liars.
2007-07-13 15:59:15 · answer #1 · answered by Lionheart ® 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Who said Intelligent Falling is ridiculous? There's no proof for gravity. Science is nothing but paperwork written by the Governments. All BS. I hate science!
2016-05-17 07:22:17 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a intelligent design researcher who has made a new discovery that will lead to disproving the Darwin theory of evolution. This new discovery will lead to intelligent design being taught in science classes in public schools and the Bible will be the text book it is taught out of.
2007-07-13 16:37:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
LMAO- I think the people who don't believe in evolution feel that way because they haven't personally experienced it. When I hear people say gravity is just a theory, it's not proven, I say okay how about floating then.
2007-07-13 15:55:54 · answer #4 · answered by Pangloss (Ancora Imparo) AFA 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Comparing gravity and evolution is ridiculous. You can see gravity. Evolution? Not even close. Let's see evolution in a living form transitioning from one species to an entirely different one. Then you can attach that description of "theory" to evolution. If it hasn't happened by now - forget it.
2007-07-13 16:00:15 · answer #5 · answered by JohnFromNC 7 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Ramen!
2007-07-13 15:52:02 · answer #6 · answered by upallnite 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I guess I better start looking for intelligent questions also.
2007-07-13 15:54:37 · answer #7 · answered by future dr.t (IM) 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
how about unintelligent design ...,seems little more appropriate to me.
2007-07-13 15:52:59 · answer #8 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You got it bass ackward, it is Devine Design, Human Failure.
2007-07-13 15:53:04 · answer #9 · answered by The Cythian 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
State your question better so people can understand.
2007-07-13 15:55:40 · answer #10 · answered by Immortal Syther 1 · 1⤊ 4⤋