Can We Be Certain That Evolution Is A Myth?

Question

The fossil record is an embarrassment to evolutionists. No verifiable transitions from one kind to another have as yet been found.

In an age of scientific enlightenment, it is incredible to think people are willing to maintain that something so vastly complex arose by chance.

While chance is a blow to the theory of evolution, the law of science are a bullet to its head. The basic laws of science, including the laws of effect and their causes---- energy conservation and entropy---undergird the creation model for origins and undermine the evolutionary hypotheisis. We must resist evolutionists who attempt to brainwash people into thinking that evolution is science.

Dr. Louis Bounoure, former director of research at the French National Center for Science Research, calls evolution "A Fairy Tale for Grown-Ups"

http://www.godrules.net/evolutioncruncher/CruncherTOC.htm

Answer 1

Those who believe in evolution (the scientist) actually think they have everyone fooled. And, most are. This is sad.

Evolution is worse than a fairy tale. Every time something new is discovered that does not support their feeble theory-they just "adjust" it to fit. How incredibly foolish. And these guys are- e d u c a t e d ! ! !

Answer 2

1) to ansewer your question. Yes, if it were a mith, we'd know by know that evolution was not a established valid theory. However that is not the case at all.

The fossil record clearly backs up and confirms evolution, in spite of people claiming otherwise there are plenty of fossil data backing up evolution, what is ttruly amazing given how hard it is to form fossils

There are NO Laws of Physics that undermine the theory of evolution. (That is a missinformed excuse for an argument and a lie).

I can only hope Dr. Louis Bounoure backs up his statement better than that.

I don't think i can change your mind but i ask you to reaserch about evolution and creationism.The "laws of effect and their causes, energy conservation and entropy" argument is really really flawed. I hope you come up with better arguments the next time

Paz de Cristo

Answer 3

In the Middle Age, the Holy Church would have used methods (which later were very much in favour in some WW2 camps) to prevent people from asking this type of questions.

It's over now, you know?....

And, of course, you also believe that the Sun revolves around the Earth?

The question is not evolution vs creation. The problem is, for some, evolution vs. regression. We all have a brain. Some of us gave up using it.

Answer 4

well we have to understand that there are 2 types of evolution, one (that the world is trying to prove) is that life came about in a sterile environment, (& that Humans evolved brains larger then they could use)

The other type is eveloution is evoulation by CREATION consider what did the type of car you drive look like 75 yrs ago? well it has evolved, but by creation likewise God when he prepaired the earth to support human life went through an eveloutionery process of creating a biosphere that took 7 creative days (a creative day can be eaons of time)

Answer 5

Your funny!!
I`ve been collecting fossils for a while, and got about 500 of the best specimens on this planet!! I got to live in China, and collect the best fossils specimens the world has ever seen, and I can tell you that your assumption are lost in space!
First transitional species have been found all over the place, and even got a small snake with legs from Gansu province in China, exposed in a German museum! You may not hear about them as your research on the subject is limited by the availability of the specimens, since they are mostly in museums on the other side of the planet!
Also, I admit that the evolution theory as Darwin sees it, is not complete, and its missing a HUGE part of the puzzle to complete the theory. And since you mainly have access to main stream ressources, and not to the active field of study (that are not printed in any main stream magazines), then I will tell you a hint... The study of the genome project (human DNA), have showed that 41% of our DNA materials were coming from VIRUS!! It appear from this study, that all life on Earth are part of a common symbiotic system, and virus and bacteria, have contributed to make human beings become what they are today!!

Answer 6

But young one.. Human Evolution is known to those who have gone beyond the spectrum of deceit. We do adapt to the changes on the earth.

Monkeys,Apes, ext..fish. we have not evolved from those.

We come from humans not animals different DNA altogether. That is what separates us.

God created us in his image.First we were born in heaven then gained our human bodies. Man has evolved. Men do not live as long as they use to. Many can not comprehend the idea. The world was in deed flooded at one time.Now I am not stating during the Moses Flood. But it has been proved that the atmospheric change of the world has caused our body to decay at an earlier stage then long ago.

Many religious people that truly lead a body have learned and understand the difference.

Answer 7

anyone who says that evolution is a myth needs to take their head out of the sand. Also please explain why the fossil record is an "embarrassment" I figure it is stone cold proof for evolution. Who ever wrote this paragraph needs to open up a scientific book and put down your religious propaganda. evolution does not disprove your higher being it just explains how different animals come about. take down your defenses and say hello to common sense.

Answer 8

Why is this in the religion section? There is nothing religious about this question.


Btw, many transitional fossils have been found. The fossils for the evolution is quite complete.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-misconceptions.html#thermo

Your whole violation of the conservation of energy and entropy, disproved up in that link.

So, whats your story? If you really believe this, why didn't you post this in the science section?

Answer 9

Did this come from "The Revised Quote Book"? This collage of dubious material including but not limited to selective misquotation, plagiarism, obsolete material, secondary or tertiary sources and odd bibliography was blown out of the water in 1994 by Professor Ian Plimer. See "Telling Lies For God", Random House, Australia, 1994 ISBN 0 09 182852 X, in particular see pages 211 to 215.

This book is a must for those in doubt about creationism or evolution. Prof. Plimer exposes some creationist leaders as habitual liars who have continued to repeat their lies even after public correction. Indeed he and others have written that some are such habitual liars and have been over so many years that they are now no longer aware of the difference between truth and lies.

He also shows that their theological qualifications are slender or non-existent and that their scientific careers were abbreviated or non-existent. Some are exposed as UFO alien believers, others as flat-Earthers or Earth-centric.

He documents cases of attempted media manipulation, refusal to "debate" evolutionists and/or Hebrew or religious scholars because the creationists could not control the agenda, "debates" which turn out to be lectures by two or three lecturers, lectures which run over time allowing no time for questions, or where questions are allowed, physical removal of persons who ask "unsuitable" questions. In some cases threats of physical violence have been used, in another actual physical violence was used but was not successful.

Outside the lectures much printed material is on sale. Much of this material contains assertions that have been discredited years before. However it remains in print. The assertions about the bombardier beetle are a good example. Despite the fact that assertions in a 1978 pamphlet about the explosive nature of the beetle's defensive secretions were publicly demonstrated to the author (Dr. D.T. G.) to be wrong, the pamphlet was sill in circulation four years later.

When the boot is on the other foot of course it is a different matter. A study of the lectures and "debates" of one prominent creationist (Dr. D.T. G.) revealed that he had stuck to the same material for years and used a card index of answers to the usual objections to creationism. When questions were asked of Dr. G. outside that material he had no answers. This produced a lot of correspondence berating Prof. Plimer for treating Dr. G. in that manner. Prof. Plimer was unrepentant.

In one incident Dr. G. was shown a skull identified by fossil experts as "homo erectus". This is an actual transitional form, but that was not revealed to Dr. G. He immediately identified it as that of a monkey. Another skull, that of a gorilla was produced and the differences pointed out to him. As you are probably aware, a gorilla is neither "homo" nor monkey.

Prof. Plimer further exposes financial irregularities in an Australian branch of a creationist "science" organisation, closely associated with "The Revised Quote Book" including speculation on gold contrary to the articles of incorporation of their organisation. Further the organisation was investigated by the Queensland State Police fraud squad in 1992. No charges were laid, however.

At one time their internationally well regarded firm of auditors resigned just before preparation of yearly accounts were due. This is pretty unusual for any financially respectable organisation and a spokesman for the organisation passed it off as due to the fact that they wished for a "Christian" auditor who would charge less for the service. In the event the firm's previous charge had been a mere AU$1200 and their "Christian" auditor charged AU$3000. Cheap at half the price.

In another incident Prof. Plimer, through an intermediary, supplied the organisation with a geological specimen of a mineral which can resemble paper with the hint that it had been found associated with coal near Newcastle, Australia. Photographs of the mineral appeared in one of their publications with the assertion that it appeared to be paper, further "proof" that the accepted geological timescale was wrong, the paper was from pre-flood times therefore Genesis was right and evolution wrong. The article was written by Carl Wieland. This was despite the fact that the organisation had a geologist on the staff (A.A. Snelling).

After this publication, a heavy handed hint was dropped that the material was not paper but palygorskite, which can resemble paper. Accordingly in the next issue the publication carried this correction. However the mineral was not palygorskite but attapulgite, a related but not identical mineral. Plimer pointed out that any experienced geologist could have identified the mineral. I might add that any reasonable person could have determined within a few minutes that it was a mineral and not paper.

Similar hoaxes have been pulled on "creation scientists" in the USA, the most notable recent one was the piece of teriyaki sauce soaked American pine passed off as a piece of Noah's ark. This became the basis of a CBS television show and was loudly exposed in the Los Angeles Times soon after.

Your assertion about the second law of thermodynamics is mistaken. The second law refers to closed systems where energy (heat) may not enter or escape. The Earth is not a closed system as it is constantly heated by the Sun, and constantly radiates that heat back into space.

Almost all the other assertions about evolution are as easily refuted. However the fraudulent ones requite much more documentation, which is something the creationist fraudsters well understand.

Evolution is a fact. It was noticed as a fact in the mid 18th century if not before. There are tens of thousands of scientific papers which add additional facts to the original observations, either directly or indirectly. There are tens of thousands of scientific papers which support the theory of evolution more or less as as it now stands, either directly or indirectly.

Creationism is a myth. There is not a single fact that it can call its own. It is recognised as a myth not only by atheists but by the larger Christian churches on the planet.

In recent years there has been quite a lot of well founded anxiety about sexual and physical abuse of children. Exposing children to the sophisticated (and I mean that in all its connotations) codswallop of creationism is intellectual abuse.

You can be sure that creationism, creation science and intelligent design are "an orchestrated litany of lies".

Answer 10

Granted the theory of evolution has its kinks,

but religion in itself and the believe in gods and goddesses is incredibly shallow and stupid

Answer 11

GROAN! Evolution is NOT a MYTH.

Evolution is based on evidence.

Go and read the Counter Creationism Handbook or study logic and stop parroting whatever ignorant fanatics tell you!

Learn to think for yourself!