2007-07-13 13:56:56 · 16 answers · asked by dr.macgruder 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
who cares we got to kill a hell of a lot of camel jockies!!!
2007-07-13 14:14:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
the rationalization i became struggling with over there once I went initially became as a results of weapons of mass destruction. That became undesirable intel, yet even human beings in the Iraqi militia believed Saddam had WMD, so in spite of this gross intelligence failure, it became no worse than the intelligence interior the Iraqi militia the two. That has not something to do with why I easily have been struggling with there now. Now i'm struggling with to tutor that democracy can paintings for anybody, can arise to terror and violence, and can triumph over intolerance. And mutually as there are deaths, and that they are unlucky, in assessment to what you will believe on the information, the numbers of my adult males and our brothers dying are militarily insignificant. This "game" isn't approximately Saddam anymore, and it hasn't been for a mutually as. it truly is with regards to the corporate and empowerment of democracy in a united states that has been surrounded with its absence for an prolonged time. We tousled stepping into, yet i don't choose to decrease to rubble popping out. I truly believe that dropping to terror in Iraq will endager the democratic freedoms we enable those back domicile to savor. that is not for the White domicile. it truly is to not discover the WMD. it truly is for Democracy. as a results of fact of this i'm struggling with.
2016-10-21 05:05:33 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what are the false pretenses? we went because the senate and house voted yes, and the many UN resolutions gave us permission.
we could have gone simply because the UN authorized us to.
2007-07-13 14:20:52 · answer #3 · answered by darrell m 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
So are all you nut burgers going to forgive Hilary for lying to you all as well?
She was 100% behind the action and had the same access to information as Bush did.
But like all you typical libs, it is ok for her to lie because she is a lib.
2007-07-13 14:12:30 · answer #4 · answered by Bill 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
yes I pretty sure it's under false pretenses, Most americans wouldn't have gone to war in Iraq if Bush has told us it was so his friends could get richer.
2007-07-13 14:09:04 · answer #5 · answered by crushinator01 5 · 1⤊ 5⤋
I do. I suspect that a majority of the citizens in non-U.S. western countries never bought Bush's false claims in support of the war (I live in Canada, in which the majority of citizens polled did not support Bush's invasion). In Britain, Tony Blair did, and he paid the political price in the end.
2007-07-13 14:02:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
I most certainly do. I have watched these proceedings from start to finish. I thought so before they voted because the great rush seemed really fishy to me. What about you?
2007-07-13 14:14:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
uh, i do.
we still don't know why we invaded iraq.
every reason that bush has given has turned out to be an outright lie or a deception.
me and about 75% of the american public...
2007-07-13 14:06:10 · answer #8 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
i do. osama attacked us, but we attack some other entity instead of really going after him. that's like me being shot by someone, and instead of dealing w/ the shooter, i go after his brother, or his neighbor.
2007-07-13 14:12:24 · answer #9 · answered by celticriver74 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I second the motion PAT
THANKS TO ANTHONY FOR BEING ONE OF THE MANY WHO KEEP ME SAFE AT NIGHT!!!!!!!!!
2007-07-13 14:04:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋