English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

If they've got any sense they wont.

2007-07-13 04:07:58 · answer #1 · answered by b97st 7 · 1 2

From what i understand, he would be granted a visa to come to Britain, this should not be a problem in itself, as he has committed no crime, the one who has is that daft Cheshire bit** who at 51 yrs of age could think a 26yr old guy would fancy her, talk about a mid life crisis's !!! most woman of that age, just start wearing cloths that a 20yr old would wear or adopt a handful of stray cats, but no this one who is on her 4th marriage, marries the son of the most wanted man in the world, I will give her credit for one thing, she'll probably make a lot of money by selling her story to the Sunday papers, that if she lives long enough to enjoy it. Anyway how do you think Bin Larden will feel, knowing his son has not just gone and married a western woman, but one he'd probably fancy himself, after all they must be about the same age ! Or could it be she's an MI5 agent trying to get Bin Larden to come out of hiding, so that he can be taken out ?????

2007-07-14 05:41:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

First it's "government is going to give Bin Laden's son a visa." Government is singular, not plural. You also need to use an apostrophe at the end of "Laden".

2007-07-13 11:04:25 · answer #3 · answered by jugheaduga88 2 · 0 2

The problem is the Government cannot really refuse. He is now married to a British subject. If refused then it will simply be handed over to the Human Rights fraternity - most probably Cherie Blair aka Cherie Booth.

2007-07-13 11:12:50 · answer #4 · answered by one shot 7 · 1 0

If you are talking about the one that has just married that daft slapper from Cheshire,the government reckons that he should have one,after all he's married to a British national,also any near relative of his is entitled to live in this country as a dependant,don't be surprised if Usama comes over for free medical treatment.

2007-07-13 11:26:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It would not be in the persons interest to be given a Visa for his personal safety and that most likley will be the reason given by the Home Office.

2007-07-13 20:33:45 · answer #6 · answered by realdolby 5 · 1 0

Which one? I hear there are quite many of them. All of Bin Ladens other relatives (the ones that are filthy rich) are free to come and go as they please- so I don't really see the point of refusing to give the visa.

2007-07-13 11:03:47 · answer #7 · answered by dane 4 · 2 2

there are plenty of british nationals marrying people from other countries, it doesn't always guarantee a visa. I'm surprised he would want to come to this country though.

2007-07-14 05:20:11 · answer #8 · answered by Kit9 2 · 1 0

Surely, they can refuse him on the grounds of links with terrorism, same way they can boot his wife out. How the hell she can marry someone whose father is one of the most hated men on this earth and brag about it

2007-07-15 09:34:38 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes, I think they will, and I think they should do as well; it was Osama Bin Laden who perpetrated and masterminded acts of terrorism, not his son. The son should not pay for the sins of the father. Everyone deserves a fair crack of the whip, regardless of their parentage.

2007-07-13 11:32:07 · answer #10 · answered by Kaiser_Bill 2 · 0 3

i bet they do. It's open door here for terrorists of those with dodgy connections.
The only wonder is that the US doesn't bomb us for harbouring terrorists as they did Libya.

2007-07-13 12:38:22 · answer #11 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers