I see you saw the Rational Response debates... good stuff. I like the look on Kirk's face every time his argument gets handed back to him with flaws...
especially the pascal's wager part...
2007-07-13 05:44:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
We are the result of a hybrid program and the scientist who "made us" we called a god, just like the rest of the Annunaki. Enki terra formed the earth into a livable planet for sustaining life. He then made humans from an indigenous life form and from Annunaki sperm. Yeah, he was very intelligent. That's why the first humans had belly buttons.
2007-07-12 13:40:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
They is information in the ripples in the sand. The height and spacing tell you about the water that flowed over them. Premise fails.
2007-07-12 13:44:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Those ripples ARE information. They indicate which way the waves were flowing in relation to the land.
They will indicate depositional and erosional patterns. Along with many many other indications.
YAY I win!
2007-07-12 13:34:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by meissen97 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Neurotransmitters are also information, but only in the sense that they communicate between neurons. Same thing with DNA and genes. No god needed.
2007-07-12 13:29:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Shawn B 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
I see you watched the Nightline debate. Sorry, it won't do you any good on here. However, questions about crocoducks and bananas are welcome. LOL (You are right, God is the creator of all things. Even if you are being sarcastic.)
2007-07-12 14:22:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by beano™ 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny, chew on that information for a while.
2007-07-12 13:40:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
depends are they
1.like holes in the ground
or
2.are they wave like.
holes in the ground means they're shoes wave like means they are the tide
2007-07-12 13:26:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by moomoomonsta 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Isn't God information too? Did something (someone) make him as well?
2007-07-12 13:24:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by boukenger 4
·
4⤊
1⤋
The fact that you assert that "SomeONE had to make it. That someone is GOD," doesn't make it so. There is not one scintilla of evidence that any god exists.
2007-07-12 13:32:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by YY4Me 7
·
2⤊
1⤋