Do you think male circumcision on boys penises should be banned here in The United States of America?

Answer 1

Yes. This practice has no place in a nation that considers itself civilized. We have banned female genital mutilation. We do not allow foot binding. Both of these are ancient practices that were considered culturally important. Circumcision is no different. Nobody should have body parts removed or permanently altered for non-medical reasons when they are too young to give informed consent.

Answer 2

Yes, definitly.

A study published in the British Journal of Urology (April 2007) proved that "circumcision" removes the five most sensitive areas of the penis and that no area on a "circumcised" penis compares to that which was cut off. The glans (tip of the penis) is actually the least sensitive area of the penis and that is what is left after "circumcision" for a boy to feel pleasure with. A doctor is not allowed to remove "only" 75% of a girls sensitivity so why can he do it to a boy?

"Circumcision" is mutilation.

Answer 3

no not at all i think circumcission is clean even if it is better not to be circumcision if u like to jack off a lot. I guess thats what they like best about being un circumcisiond

Answer 4

i think releigions who does circumsition do it so that the male would less frequently pleasure himself (in toher words, its just for repopulating)

i think, however, it should stay on unless a medical reason or the guy doesnt like it for some odd reason (maintence over pleasures)

Answer 5

YES!!! circumcision = mutilation

Answer 6

Definitely not. Just because we don't agree with some people that's no reason to ban their practices and traditions.

Answer 7

No its a personal choice that I personally think should be made later on in life by the man not his parents. My boyfriend is not circumsized and wishes he was its a personal choice just like abortion. It shouldn't be mandatory but it should be available for all that need it or want it.