Do you think male circumcision on boys should be banned all around the world for good and forever?

Answer 1

Yes, definitely.

A study published in the British Journal of Urology (April 2007) proved that "circumcision" removes the five most sensitive areas of the penis and that no area on a "circumcised" penis compares to that which was cut off. The glans (tip of the penis) is actually the least sensitive area of the penis and that is what is left after "circumcision" for a boy to feel pleasure with. A doctor is not allowed to remove "only" 75% of a girls sensitivity so why can he do it to a boy?

"Circumcision" removes 240 feet of nerves and 20,000 specialized nerve endings. That is more than you have in all ten of your fingertips put together.

"Circumcision" doesn't make a penis cleaner or heathier.

"Circumcision" is mutilation.

Answer 2

Yes. Other forms of child mutilation, such as foot binding, have been banned despite ancient cultural and religious histories. We are well on the way to banning female genital mutilation. Male genital mutilation should be banned as well. If adults want to do it, that's their bad choice, but children should be protected against this ghastly procedure. If you think "ghastly" is too harsh, watch a video of a baby boy having this done to him.

Answer 3

What about Jews and Muslims who believe it an ESSENTIAL part of their faiths? Do you really think it's OK to persecute all these people simply because you don't agree wiht their practice?
Unless that's precisely what you want, one never knows.

Answer 4

but what about all the jews they need to be snipped as part of their religion
and my wife likes the clean look of a snipped schlong

Answer 5

God no! Why? If your jewish it would be a nuisance.But it doesn't do any harm, so why bother?